Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ibrahim Hashimov" <security@auditcode.ai>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: uclogic: fix use-after-free of inrange_timer on remove
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 12:23:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260713122324.D9E471F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260713121042.2321-1-security@auditcode.ai>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Reordering hid_hw_stop() before timer_delete_sync() introduces a Use-After-Free on the input_dev structure.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] HID: uclogic: fix use-after-free of inrange_timer on remove ---
commit 43bb5d633bc4358be3fe68adce4de35e0008e236
Author: Ibrahim Hashimov <security@auditcode.ai>

HID: uclogic: fix use-after-free of inrange_timer on remove

This commit attempts to fix a timer re-arming race condition during driver
removal by stopping the hardware with hid_hw_stop() before calling
timer_delete_sync() on the inrange_timer.

> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-uclogic-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-uclogic-core.c
> index b73f09d26688a..925178d8feb40 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-uclogic-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-uclogic-core.c
> @@ -548,8 +548,35 @@ static void uclogic_remove(struct hid_device *hdev)
>  {
>  	struct uclogic_drvdata *drvdata = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
>  
> -	timer_delete_sync(&drvdata->inrange_timer);
> +	/*

[ ... ]

> +	 * Stopping the hardware first and only then deleting the timer
> +	 * closes that window: hid_hw_stop() will not return until the
> +	 * device can no longer feed uclogic_raw_event_pen(), so the
> +	 * timer_delete_sync() call below is guaranteed to be the last write
> +	 * to inrange_timer. This also matches the ordering already used by
> +	 * other HID drivers whose timers are re-armed from the report path,
> +	 * e.g. hid-appleir.c's key_up_timer.
> +	 */
>  	hid_hw_stop(hdev);
> +	timer_delete_sync(&drvdata->inrange_timer);

[Severity: High]
Does this reordering introduce a use-after-free on the input device memory?

When hid_hw_stop() returns, it has already disconnected and freed the input
devices, including the one pointed to by drvdata->pen_input. If the 100ms
timer fires after the input devices are freed but before timer_delete_sync()
completes, uclogic_inrange_timeout() will run and dereference the dangling
drvdata->pen_input pointer:

drivers/hid/hid-uclogic-core.c:uclogic_inrange_timeout()
    ...
    input_report_abs(input, ABS_PRESSURE, 0);

To prevent the timer from being re-armed without violating the safe teardown
order, would it be better to keep the timer cancellation before hid_hw_stop()
but replace timer_delete_sync() with timer_shutdown_sync()?

>  	kfree(drvdata->desc_ptr);
>  	uclogic_params_cleanup(&drvdata->params);
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260713121042.2321-1-security@auditcode.ai?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-13 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-13 12:10 [PATCH] HID: uclogic: fix use-after-free of inrange_timer on remove Ibrahim Hashimov
2026-07-13 12:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260713122324.D9E471F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=security@auditcode.ai \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox