From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Even Xu" <even.xu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Refine recover callback
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 04:08:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717040821.2D2AA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717035609.3874015-4-even.xu@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Race condition during device teardown allows the IRQ thread handler to unconditionally schedule `recover_work` after `cancel_work_sync()` has completed, leading to a Use-After-Free.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v4 3/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Refine recover callback ---
commit 476846b5d6215f9a1a461a86f427618ddd19b6d1
Author: Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com>
HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Refine recover callback
This patch updates the recovery flow to execute in a workqueue rather than
directly in the IRQ handler. It introduces a recover_work item and a
recovery_disabled flag to manage the teardown process.
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-quickspi/pci-quickspi.c b/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-quickspi/pci-quickspi.c
> index 4ae2e1718b30c..db7ede5cc7a29 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-quickspi/pci-quickspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-quickspi/pci-quickspi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -337,11 +334,10 @@ static irqreturn_t quickspi_irq_thread_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> }
>
> end:
> if (err_recover)
> - if (try_recover(qsdev))
> - qsdev->state = QUICKSPI_DISABLED;
> + schedule_work(&qsdev->recover_work);
[Severity: High]
Can this schedule the work after it has been cancelled during device teardown?
Since the threaded IRQ handler doesn't check the recovery_disabled flag
before calling schedule_work(), if quickspi_irq_thread_handler() runs
concurrently with quickspi_dev_deinit():
CPU 1
quickspi_dev_deinit()
WRITE_ONCE(qsdev->recovery_disabled, true);
cancel_work_sync(&qsdev->recover_work);
// returns, and eventually devres frees qsdev
CPU 2
quickspi_irq_thread_handler()
...
if (err_recover)
schedule_work(&qsdev->recover_work);
Could CPU 2 queue the work after CPU 1 finishes cancel_work_sync()?
If the scheduled work executes after qsdev has been freed, will this cause a
use-after-free when try_recover() reads qsdev->recovery_disabled?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717035609.3874015-1-even.xu@intel.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 3:56 [PATCH RESEND v4 0/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Refine error recovery flow Even Xu
2026-07-17 3:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-thc: Add API to reset read DMA Even Xu
2026-07-17 4:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 3:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quicki2c: Refine recover callback Even Xu
2026-07-17 4:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 3:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: " Even Xu
2026-07-17 4:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-17 3:37 [PATCH v4 0/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Refine error recovery flow Even Xu
2026-07-17 3:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Refine recover callback Even Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717040821.2D2AA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=even.xu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox