From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Input: st-keyscan: Improve probe error handling
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:20:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260727102017.4AE231F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727101125.28291-2-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Hardware access with disabled clock in ISR causes bus faults (spurious or pending interrupts)
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v2 2/2] Input: st-keyscan: Improve probe error handling ---
commit 006b58b79139d033aaee4496bf01651147f36cad
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Input: st-keyscan: Improve probe error handling
This commit updates probe error handling by using dev_err_probe() for
devm_clk_get(), dropping a redundant error message after devm_request_irq(),
and returning the original error code from platform_get_irq().
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/st-keyscan.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/st-keyscan.c
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/st-keyscan.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/st-keyscan.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -188,14 +187,12 @@ static int keyscan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> keypad_data->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (keypad_data->irq < 0)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return keypad_data->irq;
>
> error = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, keypad_data->irq, keyscan_isr, 0,
> pdev->name, keypad_data);
> - if (error) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ\n");
> + if (error)
> return error;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed a pre-existing issue
with how the interrupt is registered here.
Since keyscan_stop() is called just before this in keyscan_probe(), the IP
block's clock is already gated. By requesting the interrupt without
IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, the interrupt is immediately unmasked at the interrupt
controller.
If a pending or spurious interrupt fires before the device is opened, could
the ISR attempt to access hardware registers while the clock is disabled?
drivers/input/keyboard/st-keyscan.c:keyscan_isr() {
...
state = readl(keypad->base + KEYSCAN_MATRIX_STATE_OFF) & 0xffff;
...
}
Does this sequence risk a synchronous external abort (bus fault) causing a
kernel panic on this platform?
Would it be safer to request the IRQ with IRQF_NO_AUTOEN so it remains masked
until keyscan_open() explicitly enables the clock? I noticed this same window
might exist in keyscan_close(), which disables the clock via keyscan_stop()
but leaves the IRQ unmasked.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260727101125.28291-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 10:11 [PATCH v2 1/2] Input: snvs_pwrkey: Improve probe error handling phucduc.bui
2026-07-27 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Input: st-keyscan: " phucduc.bui
2026-07-27 10:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-27 10:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Input: snvs_pwrkey: " sashiko-bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-20 9:08 phucduc.bui
2026-07-20 9:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Input: st-keyscan: " phucduc.bui
2026-07-20 9:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:08 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-07-21 2:20 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-07-21 2:41 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-07-25 1:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-07-27 6:43 ` Bui Duc Phuc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260727102017.4AE231F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox