Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sanjay Chitroda" <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] iio: hid-sensors: remove unused iio_dev argument
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 12:37:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806123738.5103F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806-28-apr-iio-redundant-argument-v5-temp-v5-1-f1f92c1d830f@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Concurrent execution of `sensor_hub_raw_event` and a child IIO driver's `remove` function can cause a Use-After-Free on the IIO device state.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v5 01/13] iio: hid-sensors: remove unused iio_dev argument ---
commit c12a28d854a2931313f7d217face266eaf20a33a
Author: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>

iio: hid-sensors: remove unused iio_dev argument

hid_sensor_remove_trigger() no longer uses the iio_dev argument. Remove the
unused argument from all HID IIO drivers to match updated function prototype.

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c b/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static void hid_accel_3d_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>  	sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the concurrent execution
of sensor_hub_raw_event() and this remove() function cause a use-after-free
on the IIO device state?

Looking at sensor_hub_remove_callback() in drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c, it
removes the callback using dyn_callback_lock but does not synchronize with
pdata->lock:

drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c:sensor_hub_remove_callback() {
    spin_lock_irqsave(&pdata->dyn_callback_lock, flags);
    // list removal
    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pdata->dyn_callback_lock, flags);
}

If an unbind happens concurrently with an incoming hardware event:

CPU1
sensor_hub_raw_event()
    acquires pdata->lock
    finds registered callback

CPU2
hid_accel_3d_remove()
    sensor_hub_remove_callback()
        removes callback and returns
    devres framework frees the IIO device state

CPU1
sensor_hub_raw_event()
    if (callback->capture_sample) {
        callback->capture_sample(...) // Dereferences freed IIO state

Can this lead to memory corruption during physical device removal or sysfs
unbind?

> -	hid_sensor_remove_trigger(indio_dev, &accel_state->common_attributes);
> +	hid_sensor_remove_trigger(&accel_state->common_attributes);
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806-28-apr-iio-redundant-argument-v5-temp-v5-0-f1f92c1d830f@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06 12:25 [PATCH v5 00/13] HID: iio: Introduce devm_ APIs for HID sensors Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] iio: hid-sensors: remove unused iio_dev argument Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:37   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] iio: hid-sensors: introduce device managed API Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] HID: hid-sensor-hub: " Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 20:10   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] iio: gyro: hid-sensor-gyro-3d: convert probe and teardown to devm-managed resources Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] iio: accel: hid-sensor-accel-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] iio: humidity: hid-sensor-humidity: " Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] iio: light: hid-sensor-prox: " Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] iio: light: hid-sensor-als: " Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] iio: magnetometer: hid-sensor-magn-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-incl-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-rotation: " Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] iio: position: hid-sensor-custom-intel-hinge: " Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] iio: pressure: hid-sensor-press: " Sanjay Chitroda via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:44   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260806123738.5103F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox