From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Elliot Douglas" <edouglas7358@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] HID: logitech-hidpp: add HID++ 2.0 reprogrammable button support
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 20:13:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812201312.9E1E01F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812195842.77724-2-edouglas7358@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Use-after-free of `hidpp->input` when `input_register_device` fails.
- [High] Out-of-bounds read in `hidpp_raw_hidpp_event()` when copying the report structure.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3 1/2] HID: logitech-hidpp: add HID++ 2.0 reprogrammable button support ---
commit 8ed227c4b30632c93149b188c8de90eb6920c093
Author: Elliot Douglas <edouglas7358@gmail.com>
HID: logitech-hidpp: add HID++ 2.0 reprogrammable button support
Some Logitech HID++ 2.0 mice can report diverted reprogrammable controls
through HID++ feature 0x1b04, SpecialKeysMseButtons / REPROG_CONTROLS_V4,
instead of the normal HID mouse report.
Link: https://lekensteyn.nl/files/logitech/x1b04_specialkeysmsebuttons.html
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> index 70ba1a5e40d8e..f9189e14fb780 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3601,6 +3606,195 @@ static int hidpp10_extra_mouse_buttons_raw_event(struct hidpp_device *hidpp,
> return 1;
> }
>
> +/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
> +/* HID++2.0 reprogrammable controls */
> +/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
[ ... ]
> +static int hidpp20_reprog_controls_raw_event(struct hidpp_device *hidpp,
> + u8 *data, int size)
> +{
> + const struct hidpp_reprog_control_mapping *mapping;
> + struct hidpp_report *report = (struct hidpp_report *)data;
> + u16 controls[4];
> + bool pressed;
> + unsigned int i, j;
> +
> + if (!(hidpp->quirks & HIDPP_QUIRK_HIDPP_REPROG_CONTROLS_BTNS) ||
> + !hidpp->input ||
> + !hidpp->reprog_controls ||
> + hidpp->reprog_controls_feature_index == 0xff)
> + return 0;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could this lead to a
use-after-free of hidpp->input if input registration fails?
Looking at hidpp_connect_event() in drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c, if
input_register_device() fails, it frees the input device but leaves the
global hidpp->input pointer dangling:
ret = input_register_device(input);
if (ret) {
input_free_device(input);
return;
}
Since the device is actively receiving interrupts, incoming reports can trigger
raw event handlers like this newly added hidpp20_reprog_controls_raw_event().
The handler bypasses the !hidpp->input check because the pointer is not NULL,
and subsequently calling input_report_key() with the freed pointer could cause
a use-after-free.
> +
> + if (size < HIDPP_REPORT_LONG_LENGTH ||
> + report->fap.feature_index != hidpp->reprog_controls_feature_index ||
> + report->fap.funcindex_clientid != HIDPP_REPROG_CONTROLS_EVENT_DIVERTED)
> + return 0;
[ ... ]
> @@ -3971,6 +4168,10 @@ static int hidpp_raw_hidpp_event(struct hidpp_device *hidpp, u8 *data,
> return ret;
> }
>
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can the struct assignment at the top of
hidpp_raw_hidpp_event() read out of bounds?
When a matching response is found, hidpp_raw_hidpp_event() performs this
assignment:
if (hidpp_match_answer(question, report) ||
hidpp_match_error(question, report)) {
*answer = *report;
hidpp->answer_available = true;
wake_up(&hidpp->wait);
The struct hidpp_report is 64 bytes in size. However, the report pointer is cast
directly from the incoming data buffer. If a device only supports SHORT
(7 bytes) or LONG (20 bytes) reports, the data buffer will be sized accordingly.
Does the 64-byte struct copy read out of bounds from the smaller heap buffer
when the incoming report is matched?
> + ret = hidpp20_reprog_controls_raw_event(hidpp, data, size);
> + if (ret != 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> if (hidpp->quirks & HIDPP_QUIRK_HIDPP_CONSUMER_VENDOR_KEYS) {
> ret = hidpp10_consumer_keys_raw_event(hidpp, data, size);
> if (ret != 0)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812195842.77724-1-edouglas7358@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 19:58 [PATCH v3 0/2] HID: logitech-hidpp: fix Signature M650 side button timing Elliot Douglas
2026-08-12 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] HID: logitech-hidpp: add HID++ 2.0 reprogrammable button support Elliot Douglas
2026-08-12 20:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 22:26 ` Bastien Nocera
2026-08-12 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] HID: logitech-hidpp: enable reprogrammable buttons on Signature M650 Elliot Douglas
2026-08-12 20:14 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812201312.9E1E01F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=edouglas7358@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox