From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tristan Madani" <tristmd@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: core: fix device cleanup on allocation failure
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 01:52:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260819015247.ACBD51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819013149.889913-1-tristmd@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Concurrent `hidraw` operations can cause a use-after-free on the SRCU structure during device destruction because `hid_bpf_destroy_device()` runs before `hid_remove_device()`.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] HID: core: fix device cleanup on allocation failure ---
commit ef17fd6111206c1e7e801f388343922186fcf0dd
Author: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
HID: core: fix device cleanup on allocation failure
This commit replaces hid_destroy_device() with put_device() in the error
path of hid_allocate_device(). This prevents a general protection fault
caused by cleaning up an uninitialized SRCU structure when
hid_bpf_device_init() fails.
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> index cf123347a2af7..9534de5317783 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> @@ -3060,7 +3060,12 @@ struct hid_device *hid_allocate_device(void)
> return hdev;
>
> out_err:
> - hid_destroy_device(hdev);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but looking at the implementation of
hid_destroy_device(), it destroys the BPF structures before unregistering
the device:
void hid_destroy_device(struct hid_device *hdev)
{
hid_bpf_destroy_device(hdev);
hid_remove_device(hdev);
put_device(&hdev->dev);
}
Can this order cause a use-after-free on the SRCU structure during a
concurrent device teardown?
If a userspace process writes to the hidraw device concurrently with a
hot-unplug, the hidraw writer could check the destroyed flag and then get
preempted before taking the SRCU lock:
CPU1 (hidraw writer)
dispatch_hid_bpf_raw_requests()
if (unlikely(hdev->bpf.destroyed))
return -ENODEV;
<preempted>
CPU2 (device unplug)
hid_destroy_device()
hid_bpf_destroy_device()
// sets bpf.destroyed = true
cleanup_srcu_struct(&hdev->bpf.srcu);
hid_remove_device()
// blocks waiting for CPU1
CPU1 (resumes)
idx = srcu_read_lock(&hdev->bpf.srcu);
Could CPU1 resume and dereference the freed SRCU internal pointers?
Should hid_remove_device() be called before hid_bpf_destroy_device() to
ensure userspace interfaces like hidraw are disconnected before the SRCU
structure is destroyed?
> + /*
> + * hid_destroy_device() cannot be used here because
> + * hid_bpf_device_init() failed and the SRCU struct was never
> + * initialized. Release the device directly.
> + */
> + put_device(&hdev->dev);
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hid_allocate_device);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260819013149.889913-1-tristmd@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-19 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 1:31 [PATCH] HID: core: fix device cleanup on allocation failure Tristan Madani
2026-08-19 1:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-19 5:52 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260819015247.ACBD51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tristmd@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox