From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Triet Hoang" <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: misc: Convert to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 02:50:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821025021.9F9891F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821024215.55188-1-triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The patch breaks the build when `CONFIG_PM` is disabled because `pm80x_dev_suspend` and `pm80x_dev_resume` become undeclared identifiers.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] input: misc: Convert to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() ---
commit 831b6a38a335cea06b4312be1068bf63ef9bd3c9
Author: Triet Hoang <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
input: misc: Convert to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
Convert deprecated SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS and
pm_sleep_ptr(). This drops the __maybe_unused annotations from the resume
callbacks and reduces kernel size when PM is disabled.
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/88pm80x_onkey.c b/drivers/input/misc/88pm80x_onkey.c
> index fee28e537898a..d4f344e2bf5c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/88pm80x_onkey.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/88pm80x_onkey.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pm80x_onkey_handler(int irq, void *data)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pm80x_onkey_pm_ops, pm80x_dev_suspend,
> +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pm80x_onkey_pm_ops, pm80x_dev_suspend,
> pm80x_dev_resume);
[Severity: Low]
Does this break the build when CONFIG_PM is disabled?
Unlike SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS, DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS uses pm_sleep_ptr() which
evaluates the C ternary operator with IS_ENABLED(). This means the compiler
still parses the arguments and requires them to be declared, even if they are
ultimately discarded.
Looking at include/linux/mfd/88pm80x.h, pm80x_dev_suspend and pm80x_dev_resume
are wrapped in #ifdef CONFIG_PM without providing empty fallback stubs:
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
static inline int pm80x_dev_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
...
Will this result in undeclared identifier compilation errors when building with
CONFIG_PM=n?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821024215.55188-1-triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 2:42 [PATCH] input: misc: Convert to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() Triet Hoang
2026-08-21 2:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-21 4:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Triet Hoang
2026-08-21 4:25 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260821025021.9F9891F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox