Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lee Jones" <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_bamboo_pad
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 17:22:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825172244.39AD91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825151242.576456-4-lee@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Lockless access to `shared->pen` and `shared->touch` in `wacom_mode_change_work` without RCU read lock leads to Use-After-Free.
- [High] Asynchronous resources started during probe are not cancelled if a subsequent probe step fails.
--

commit cf6bbd224806057956b357da6af1b313f006731c
Author: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>

HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_bamboo_pad
    
This patch resolves a use-after-free issue in wacom_bamboo_pad_pen_event
by introducing RCU protection for the pen and touch pointers.

> diff --git a/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c b/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
> index b88726cbbb4ec..79fd397e044af 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2836,16 +2847,19 @@ static void wacom_mode_change_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	bool is_direct = wacom->wacom_wac.is_direct_mode;
>  	int error = 0;
>  
> -	if (shared->pen) {
> -		wacom1 = hid_get_drvdata(shared->pen);
> +	struct hid_device *pen = rcu_access_pointer(shared->pen);
> +	struct hid_device *touch = rcu_access_pointer(shared->touch);
> +
> +	if (pen) {
> +		wacom1 = hid_get_drvdata(pen);
>  		wacom_release_resources(wacom1);
>  		hid_hw_stop(wacom1->hdev);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does using rcu_access_pointer() here leave
the pointer unprotected?

The rcu_access_pointer() helper doesn't establish an RCU read-side critical
section. This means a concurrent removal of the sibling device could call
wacom_remove_shared_data() and nullify the shared pointer.

If the pointer is nullified, synchronize_rcu() won't wait for this work item
to finish.

Could this sequence allow the device and its driver data to be freed while
we're still executing hid_hw_stop() on it, resulting in a use-after-free?

>  		wacom1->wacom_wac.has_mode_change = true;
>  		wacom1->wacom_wac.is_direct_mode = is_direct;
>  	}
[ ... ]

Also, regarding a pre-existing issue in wacom_parse_and_register() not modified
by this patch:

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the error path here fail to
cancel asynchronous works?

When an initialization step fails after hid_hw_start(hdev) is called,
the cleanup goes to fail_hw_stop:

fail_hw_stop:
	hid_hw_stop(hdev);
fail:
	wacom_release_resources(wacom);
	return error;

The call to hid_hw_start() enables interrupts, which could schedule work items
like wacom->battery_work, wacom->wireless_work, or wacom->mode_change_work.

Does failing to cancel these scheduled works before returning allow them to
execute after devres has freed the wacom structure?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260825151242.576456-1-lee@kernel.org?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-25 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-25 15:12 [PATCH 1/5] HID: wacom: Use hdev->product in wacom_setup_touch_input_capabilities Lee Jones
2026-08-25 15:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] HID: wacom: Advertise SW_MUTE_DEVICE capability prior to registration Lee Jones
2026-08-25 17:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26  8:02     ` Lee Jones
2026-08-25 15:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_intuos_pad Lee Jones
2026-08-25 17:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 15:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_bamboo_pad Lee Jones
2026-08-25 17:22   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-25 15:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] HID: wacom: Redesign shared sibling data lifecycle Lee Jones
2026-08-25 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] HID: wacom: Use hdev->product in wacom_setup_touch_input_capabilities sashiko-bot
2026-08-27  2:48 ` Ping Cheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260825172244.39AD91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox