From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Aditya Dash" <mradityadash@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] HID: hid-lenovo-go: normalize calibration failure status
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 15:08:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830150848.E50191F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7b6d167fae5846377d49b57b0f542063fd80ad1.1788096668.git.mradityadash@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] The drivers use static global variables for per-device state and LED registration, preventing support for multiple devices and causing state corruption.
- [High] Missing `hid_hw_stop()` and `hid_hw_close()` in probe error paths.
- [High] LED devres unregistration happens after `hid_hw_stop()`, leaving a window for illegal hardware access.
- [High] The LED `brightness_set` callback illegally sleeps.
- [High] Hardware stop leaked during device removal if endpoint address retrieval fails.
--
commit 6f9c422af24bce1a678acc087e7d364da24c0f75
Author: Aditya Dash <mradityadash@gmail.com>
HID: hid-lenovo-go: normalize calibration failure status
The driver stores the firmware result byte as an index into the
calibration status text. A Legion Go 1 returned 0x08 after an idle Stop.
The status table has only three entries, so a later read returns -EINVAL.
Keep the defined values 0x00 through 0x02. Treat larger result values as
failure before storing them.
Fixes: 995887a10da1 ("HID: hid-lenovo-go: Add Calibration Settings")
Assisted-by: Pi:gpt-5.6-sol
Signed-off-by: Aditya Dash <mradityadash@gmail.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c b/drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c
> index dbfacbb70394b..c7a2e621a4ade 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this error path leak
the HID hardware state?
drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c:hid_go_probe() {
...
ret = hid_go_cfg_probe(hdev, id);
if (ret)
dev_err_probe(&hdev->dev, ret, "Failed to start configuration interface\n");
dev_dbg(&hdev->dev, "Started Legion Go HID Device: %x\n", ep);
return ret;
}
If hid_go_cfg_probe() fails, the function returns an error without unwinding
the started hardware with hid_hw_stop() and hid_hw_close(). Since the custom
remove callback overrides the core's default unbind behavior, could this lead
to a use-after-free?
The hid-lenovo-go-s driver has the identical omission in its nested probe
error path:
drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go-s.c:hid_gos_probe() {
...
ret = hid_gos_cfg_probe(hdev, id);
if (ret)
dev_err_probe(&hdev->dev, ret, "Failed to start configuration interface");
...
}
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does using a static global variable for
per-device state prevent support for multiple devices?
drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c:
static struct hid_go_cfg {
struct delayed_work go_cfg_setup;
struct hid_go_cmd cmd;
...
If a second Lenovo Go controller is connected, the second probe overwrites
the global drvdata.hdev pointer in hid_go_cfg_probe():
drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c:hid_go_cfg_probe() {
...
mutex_init(&drvdata.cfg_mutex);
init_completion(&drvdata.cmd.done);
spin_lock_init(&drvdata.cmd.lock);
drvdata.cmd.pending = false;
hid_set_drvdata(hdev, &drvdata);
drvdata.hdev = hdev;
...
ret = devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register(&hdev->dev, &go_cdev_rgb);
...
}
Does registering the exact same static go_cdev_rgb struct with devres
corrupt the LED core lists and crash the kernel?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does manually stopping the hardware here
leave a window for illegal hardware access?
drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c:hid_go_cfg_remove() {
...
hid_hw_close(hdev);
hid_hw_stop(hdev);
hid_set_drvdata(hdev, NULL);
...
}
Because the LED is cleaned up asynchronously by devres after remove()
returns, could a user writing to the LED brightness sysfs file in this
window invoke hid_go_brightness_set(), sending an output report to a
stopped HID device using a dangling drvdata.hdev pointer?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the LED brightness_set callback
illegally sleep?
drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c:hid_go_brightness_set() {
...
ret = rgb_cfg_call(drvdata.hdev, SET_RGB_CFG, index, rgb_profile, 6);
...
}
The brightness_set LED callback is expected to be non-blocking, but it calls
rgb_cfg_call() which waits on a completion. If the LED is controlled by a
timer trigger, could this callback execute in a softirq/timer context and
cause a kernel panic?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this early return leak the hardware
start state?
drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c:hid_go_remove() {
...
int ep = get_endpoint_address(hdev);
if (ep <= 0)
return;
...
}
If a USB HID interface with no endpoints successfully passes probe() by
bypassing the config probe, does returning early here during removal entirely
bypass hid_hw_close() and hid_hw_stop(), leading to unbalanced HID core
reference counts?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1788096666.git.mradityadash@gmail.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 14:56 [PATCH v2 0/6] HID: hid-lenovo-go: fix controller configuration Aditya Dash
2026-08-30 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] HID: hid-lenovo-go: use the correct calibration commands Aditya Dash
2026-08-30 15:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] HID: hid-lenovo-go: use the right controller selectors Aditya Dash
2026-08-30 15:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] HID: hid-lenovo-go: return configuration request errors Aditya Dash
2026-08-30 15:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] HID: hid-lenovo-go: normalize calibration failure status Aditya Dash
2026-08-30 15:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-30 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] HID: hid-lenovo-go: reject unknown calibration action Aditya Dash
2026-08-30 15:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] HID: hid-lenovo-go: clear calibration status on start Aditya Dash
2026-08-30 15:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 23:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] HID: hid-lenovo-go: fix controller configuration Derek John Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830150848.E50191F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mradityadash@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox