From: Jeffin Philip <jeffinphilip14@gmail.com>
To: ccc194101@163.com
Cc: bentiss@kernel.org, chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn,
jeffinphilip14@gmail.com, jikos@kernel.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+0a031a76585d1c7e737d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] HID: corsair: do not re-schedule LED worker after it has been cancelled
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 11:20:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831055005.18420-1-jeffinphilip14@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817072831.139954-1-ccc194101@163.com>
On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:28:31 +0800, Chen Changcheng wrote:
>Commit eb51c9f8cb4f0 ("HID: corsair: cancel worker before unregistering
>LED to fix use-after-free") moved cancel_work_sync() ahead of
>led_classdev_unregister() in k90_cleanup_backlight() and
>k90_cleanup_macro_functions(). led_classdev_unregister() internally
>calls led_set_brightness(LED_OFF), which reaches the driver's
>k90_brightness_set() callback. Since that callback schedules the worker
>unconditionally, the worker was re-queued after cancel_work_sync() had
>drained it, and the subsequent kfree() freed a still-active work_struct:
>
> ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: work_struct
> hint: k90_record_led_work
>
>The removed flag check inside the worker itself only stops it from
>dereferencing freed memory once it runs; it cannot prevent the re-queue.
>
>Fix this by making k90_brightness_set() a no-op once removed is set, so
>the LED_OFF update issued from led_classdev_unregister() can no longer
>re-schedule the worker after it has been cancelled. Also apply the
>cancel-before-unregister ordering to the probe error path
>(k90_init_macro_functions() fail_sysfs) for consistency.
This UAF[1] can be prevented by your patch, would you consider adding that too
in your patch?
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6a937393.1d9ded08.62e62.0113.GAE@google.com/#R
Thanks,
Jeffin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-24 9:19 [PATCH] HID: corsair: fix use-after-free by reordering remove sequence Chen Changcheng
2026-07-24 9:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 1:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] HID: corsair: fix two use-after-free bugs on device removal Chen Changcheng
2026-07-27 1:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] HID: corsair: fix use-after-free by reordering remove sequence Chen Changcheng
2026-07-27 1:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 1:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] HID: corsair: cancel worker before unregistering LED to fix use-after-free Chen Changcheng
2026-07-27 1:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-15 18:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] HID: corsair: fix two use-after-free bugs on device removal Jeffin Philip
2026-08-17 7:23 ` Chen Changcheng
2026-08-17 7:28 ` [PATCH] HID: corsair: do not re-schedule LED worker after it has been cancelled Chen Changcheng
2026-08-17 7:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 5:50 ` Jeffin Philip [this message]
2026-08-31 7:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] HID: corsair: fix two use-after-free bugs on device removal Chen Changcheng
2026-08-03 19:22 ` Jiri Kosina
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-31 7:41 [PATCH] HID: corsair: do not re-schedule LED worker after it has been cancelled Chen Changcheng
2026-08-31 7:53 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831055005.18420-1-jeffinphilip14@gmail.com \
--to=jeffinphilip14@gmail.com \
--cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
--cc=ccc194101@163.com \
--cc=chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+0a031a76585d1c7e737d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox