Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Aditya Dash" <mradityadash@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] HID: hid-lenovo-go: use the right controller selectors
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 06:46:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901064616.BEB3C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec070d00bfb9c9a83b2883ccee62cba7da62028b.1788222001.git.mradityadash@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The driver relies on static global structures (`drvdata`, `go_cdev_rgb`) to maintain per-device state and register LED devices, breaking multi-device support and causing memory corruption.
- [High] Hardware is left in an active, open state if `hid_go_cfg_probe()` fails, due to missing `hid_hw_stop()` and `hid_hw_close()` calls in the `hid_go_probe()` error path.
- [High] Hardware cleanup and workcancellation are bypassed in `hid_go_remove()` for generic endpoints, leaving unmanaged active hardware and risking use-after-free.
- [High] Out-of-bounds array read in `get_endpoint_address()` if an interface has no endpoints.
--

commit e72b397410199e2e2416cfeb7ba8e9af743302f7
Author: Aditya Dash <mradityadash@gmail.com>

HID: hid-lenovo-go: use the right controller selectors

This commit corrects the right controller selectors by changing the
imu_enabled attribute to select FEATURE_IMU_ENABLE. It also fixes the right
reset attribute to target the right controller instead of the left.

> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c b/drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c
> index b8248bf8965c6..b937d11dd6f6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c

[ ... ]

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does relying on static global structures
for per-device state break multi-device support and cause memory corruption?

Looking at drivers/hid/hid-lenovo-go.c, the driver defines global structures
rather than allocating per-device structures with devm_kzalloc():

} drvdata;
...
static struct led_classdev_mc go_cdev_rgb = {

And in hid_go_cfg_probe(), it forces all probed instances to share this
state by overwriting drvdata.hdev:

	hid_set_drvdata(hdev, &drvdata);
	drvdata.hdev = hdev;
	mutex_init(&drvdata.cfg_mutex);

If multiple gamepads are plugged in, will concurrent probes overwrite active
locks and the delayed work struct?

Also, will calling devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register() on the same
global go_cdev_rgb multiple times double-add its embedded list_head node
into the core LED subsystem lists, causing linked-list corruption?

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does hid_go_probe() leak
the hardware state if hid_go_cfg_probe() fails?

In hid_go_probe(), after hid_hw_start() and hid_hw_open() are successfully
called, if hid_go_cfg_probe() fails, the error path returns without calling
hid_hw_close() and hid_hw_stop():

	ret = hid_go_cfg_probe(hdev, id);
	if (ret)
		dev_err_probe(&hdev->dev, ret, "Failed to start configuration interface\n");

	dev_dbg(&hdev->dev, "Started Legion Go HID Device: %x\n", ep);

	return ret;

Could this leave the device unmanaged but actively running, causing resource
leaks and potential use-after-free when devres cleanup frees structures?

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is hardware cleanup bypassed in
hid_go_remove() for generic endpoints?

In hid_go_remove(), the driver unconditionally returns early for
non-configured generic endpoints:

	int ep = get_endpoint_address(hdev);

	if (ep <= 0)
		return;

Since hid_go_probe() accepts devices even if get_endpoint_address() returns
an error, leaving the generic device bound, started, and opened, does this
early return in hid_go_remove() bypass hid_hw_close() and hid_hw_stop()
entirely?

According to HID subsystem rules, omitting hid_hw_stop() in remove() leaves
the input and hidraw devices registered and active while the driver's devres
memory is freed. Can this lead to a use-after-free if userspace interacts
with the node?

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but can get_endpoint_address()
cause an out-of-bounds array read if an interface has no endpoints?

The function fetches the endpoint array and checks if ep is NULL, but it
dereferences it without checking if desc.bNumEndpoints > 0:

	ep = intf->cur_altsetting->endpoint;
	if (!ep)
		return -ENODEV;

	return ep->desc.bEndpointAddress;

If the interface has bNumEndpoints == 0, the USB core allocates a
zero-length array, returning ZERO_SIZE_PTR.

Since if (!ep) evaluates to false for ZERO_SIZE_PTR, will dereferencing it
cause an out-of-bounds read?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1788222001.git.mradityadash@gmail.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-01  6:36 [PATCH v3 0/7] HID: hid-lenovo-go: fix controller configuration Aditya Dash
2026-09-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] HID: hid-lenovo-go: use the correct calibration commands Aditya Dash
2026-09-01  6:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] HID: hid-lenovo-go: use the right controller selectors Aditya Dash
2026-09-01  6:46   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] HID: hid-lenovo-go: initialize command completion before hardware Aditya Dash
2026-09-01  6:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] HID: hid-lenovo-go: return configuration request errors Aditya Dash
2026-09-01  6:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] HID: hid-lenovo-go: normalize calibration failure status Aditya Dash
2026-09-01  6:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 15:57   ` Derek John Clark
2026-09-01 17:06     ` Aditya
2026-09-02 12:40       ` Derek J. Clark
2026-09-05  6:10         ` Aditya Dash
2026-09-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] HID: hid-lenovo-go: reject unknown calibration action Aditya Dash
2026-09-01  6:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] HID: hid-lenovo-go: clear calibration status on start Aditya Dash
2026-09-01  7:00   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260901064616.BEB3C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mradityadash@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox