From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A9F2519925; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789569077; cv=none; b=JNTyIOQT7BdMNih2SGYgz0eGL5XjtGMm+BEXeUcApm0b28ko9kswhhZ09jQt/Bo7Y7/qvR17rAfGiGGNqrzl2llxgcP8x26TNyILNvW/E4HOjbCMLP5Xj73VRbWNO4VmGPWeSg/8rCwyI+z4Iy/LT/u0gTmonPP+MTvDuZr3/Xc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789569077; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lX4sBLQWCgzSTEPrUyTPOqD8/ta6vpCp3yXo4tlAwqk=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=uSImZDgbBG8DTm62FrnwCKy4JzmFql5oaPSw3jYTkVSTA+GfZstcWnaP6UvD7l6L/pcMKjY8eKQPyQgDNniRTUx3GxbXizmmke1i6cg6U6IrtsUVR51psX9mMtfyAEZYM+VEHnmklgjm7gyeaoJnTorpYHIJf5raGjPB5pBS4d0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cUQdrEG2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cUQdrEG2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 811EF1F000FF; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:31:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789569074; bh=MyHBmiyk0d26r4cuOXzwI2x+5zAzBC2ZsrXc1p/R3dI=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=cUQdrEG2wlUA2R34kh94j3mMU+jiP46BLyMyA4jn8nIx+pjABby1ANlRGZ3NHFadG /JlrEqjQeQBuAl5LLffCOvaakJLNBjlU8eSt1J8dOVef97HA2u8ewM8cAh/Mww55Z4 gaSmZhfjYDwZxoiY+3wzTdqoBIR6j0J8Jj2RnQho0nBZFMHmFtUpYIrXPil92nfmp3 TD8F3PWfZXzmssU4c2ldZGOSi19rAI8JdfSMY27YGypVnqlA3UHbDgbYyIucrcQnoy PIfdQZj7SSGViSDIG6f6wFjb23TsG+mPUnUbyBLP0jJZALs9PgmcYA1P63lByIy8lZ a31/hTRLAES6g== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/19] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,rpmcc: Add MSM8952 compatible Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Muzaffer Kadir" Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, lee@kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, mfd@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20260916-msm8952-initial-support-v2-12-798c2602dde1@mainlining.org> References: <20260916-msm8952-initial-support-v2-0-798c2602dde1@mainlining.org> <20260916-msm8952-initial-support-v2-12-798c2602dde1@mainlining.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:31:13 +0000 Message-Id: <20260916143113.811EF1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-input@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(= s) to consider: - [Low] dt-bindings: missing qcom,rpmcc-msm8952 in allOf conditional block -- commit 1a36458fc826545d7c948ae6e71fb8e460a8f8cc Author: Muzaffer Kadir dt-bindings: clock: qcom,rpmcc: Add MSM8952 compatible =20 Document the rpmcc found on MSM8952. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml b/Do= cumentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml > index 17332aa558862..aa532f208f5af 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml > @@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ properties: > - qcom,rpmcc-shikra > - const: qcom,rpmcc-qcm2290 > - const: qcom,rpmcc > + - items: > + - enum: > + - qcom,rpmcc-msm8952 > + - const: qcom,rpmcc-msm8976 > + - const: qcom,rpmcc [Severity: Low] Should qcom,rpmcc-msm8952 also be added to the allOf conditional block furt= her down in the file? The new compatible string is defined here, but appears to be missing from t= he explicit enumeration block under allOf:if:properties:compatible: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml: contains: enum: ... - qcom,rpmcc-msm8953 - qcom,rpmcc-msm8974 - qcom,rpmcc-msm8976 - qcom,rpmcc-msm8992 Without it in this block, device tree schema validation for the new compati= ble string will be incomplete if a node uses it without the fallback string, potentially allowing invalid clock configurations (such as the wrong number= or names of clocks) to silently pass validation. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260916-msm8952-in= itial-support-v2-0-798c2602dde1@mainlining.org?part=3D12