From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hui Peng" <benquike@gmail.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: fix sony Rock Band 3 IRQ sleep and hid_debug_events_read() UAF
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 22:52:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260919225205.A43191F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260919222630.3798292-1-benquike@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] hid: commit message and code mismatch
--
commit e51431362491e22e949d7055095af58151300ef8
Author: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
HID: fix sony Rock Band 3 IRQ sleep and hid_debug_events_read() UAF
This commit aims to fix two issues: deferring a full-report feature
request in the sony driver to avoid sleeping in interrupt context, and
preventing a wait queue leak in hid-debug.
> Fix two issues in drivers/hid/:
>
> 1. In sony_raw_event() (drivers/hid/hid-sony.c), defer the Rock Band 3
> Pro controller full-report feature request to sony_state_worker()
> instead of calling hid_hw_raw_request() synchronously from interrupt
> context.
> 2. In hid_debug_events_read() and hid_debug_events_release()
> (drivers/hid/hid-debug.c), remove list->node from hdev->debug_list
> under hdev->debug_list_lock before freeing or when hdev is unbound so
> hid_dump_input() cannot access a freed debug list entry.
[Severity: Medium]
This isn't a bug in the code, but does this commit message accurately reflect
the patch contents?
The code does not appear to touch hid_debug_events_release() or
hdev->debug_list. Instead, it fixes a wait queue handling issue in
hid_debug_events_read(). Furthermore, the sony fix introduces a brand new
worker rather than using the existing sony_state_worker() as claimed.
Could the commit message be updated to match the actual code changes?
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c b/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c
> index f44e6e708404c..edc45ca9e024e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c
> @@ -3728,15 +3728,14 @@ static ssize_t hid_debug_events_read(struct file *file, char __user *buffer,
> break;
> }
>
> - /* if list->hdev is NULL we cannot remove_wait_queue().
> - /* if list->hdev->debug is 0 then hid_debug_unregister()
> - * was already called and list->hdev is being destroyed.
> - * if we add remove_wait_queue() here we can hit a race.
> + /* if list->hdev->debug is 0 then hid_debug_unregister()
> + * was already called; break out of the wait loop so
> + * remove_wait_queue() is unconditionally called before
> + * returning.
> */
[Severity: Medium]
The patch comment here in hid_debug_events_read() correctly describes
breaking out of the wait loop to call remove_wait_queue().
However, the commit message mentions removing list->node from hdev->debug_list
in hid_debug_events_release(), which isn't present in this hunk or the rest of
the patch. Is the commit description perhaps meant for a different or older
version of this patch?
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> index 50f5ad6bbeb4c..d3862ddf68c91 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -657,6 +658,14 @@ static int rb3_pro_instrument_enable_full_report(struct sony_sc *sc)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void rb3_pro_poke_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct sony_sc *sc = container_of(work, struct sony_sc,
> + rb3_pro_poke_work);
> +
> + rb3_pro_instrument_enable_full_report(sc);
> +}
> +
[Severity: Medium]
The implementation here in drivers/hid/hid-sony.c creates a new
rb3_pro_poke_worker instead of deferring to sony_state_worker() as claimed in
the commit message.
Should the commit message be updated to reflect the use of this new dedicated
worker?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260919222630.3798292-1-benquike@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-19 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 22:26 [PATCH] HID: fix sony Rock Band 3 IRQ sleep and hid_debug_events_read() UAF Hui Peng
2026-09-19 22:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260919225205.A43191F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=benquike@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox