From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vasily Khoruzhick Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: s3c2410_ts: Move to clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:13:41 +0300 Message-ID: <2138540.gOK28iFQ6r@vasilykh-desktop-i5> References: <1404155377-2862-1-git-send-email-anarsoul@gmail.com> <20140709010049.GC14935@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:47282 "EHLO mail-we0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753963AbaGIJPd (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2014 05:15:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140709010049.GC14935@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org On 8 July 2014 18:00:49 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi Dmitry, > > > > - clk_disable(ts.clock); > > + clk_disable_unprepare(ts.clock); > > Do we really need to unprepare on suspend? Why simply disabling is not > enough here? You're right, disabling should be enough here. I'll resend a patch after testing on a hardware. Regards Vasily