From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Daniel Leung" Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: hid-sensor-hub: do not process feature reports in raw_event Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <33544.10.7.197.74.1365551736.squirrel@linux.intel.com> References: <1363886546-6517-1-git-send-email-daniel.leung@linux.intel.com> <51507136.4020308@linux.intel.com> <38514.10.7.197.74.1365440092.squirrel@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <38514.10.7.197.74.1365440092.squirrel@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jiri Kosina , Srinivas Pandruvada , daniel.leung@linux.intel.com, srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org >> On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >> >>> Daniel, >>> >>> I am looking at 3.9.rc1. >>> The only place I see the raw_event callback is called from >>> hid/hid_input_report(). hid_input_report is called with type >>> HID_INPUT_REPORT >>> in all cases, except hid_ctrl(), where it can be different depending on >>> xx.report->type. But here, the return value is not checked. >>> >>> Do you know the call chain for HID_FETURE_REPORT, where this is >>> creating >>> problem? >> >> This was exactly what I was wondering about when I have seen the initial >> patch a few weeks ago. >> >> Daniel, could you please elaborate? Is there a out-of-tree driver for >> Acer >> Iconia W700? > > Sorry for the late reply. I was out of town and was having difficulties > accessing the mail server. > > For the call path, here is what I got (using WARN_ON()): > > <4>[ 150.943775] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > <4>[ 150.943861] WARNING: at > ../../../../../../../../../../home/dleung/android/ia/private/jb-mr1-internal/kernel/intel/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c:418 > sensor_hub_raw_event+0x2d0/0x3b0 [hid_sensor_hub]() > <4>[ 150.944028] Hardware name: ICONIA W700 > <7>[ 150.944071] Modules linked in: hid_sensor_als hid_sensor_gyro_3d > hid_sensor_accel_3d uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops > videobuf2_core btusb bluetooth hid_multitouch ath9k ath9k_common ath9k_hw > ath snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek ip6table_raw snd_hda_intel > iptable_raw snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_page_alloc snd_timer snd > soundcore hid_sensor_trigger hid_sensor_iio_common hid_sensor_hub > industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf industrialio coretemp > <7>[ 150.944132] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/1 Not tainted > 3.8.0-aia1-00043-gd7fd780-dirty #2 > <7>[ 150.944136] Call Trace: > <7>[ 150.944141] [] > warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 > <7>[ 150.944163] [] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 > <7>[ 150.944173] [] sensor_hub_raw_event+0x2d0/0x3b0 > [hid_sensor_hub] > <7>[ 150.944184] [] ? > _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x57/0x70 > <7>[ 150.944195] [] hid_input_report+0x283/0x2d0 > <7>[ 150.944203] [] hid_ctrl+0x9f/0x180 > <7>[ 150.944212] [] usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x77/0x110 > <7>[ 150.944222] [] xhci_irq+0x60f/0x1530 > <7>[ 150.944230] [] ? handle_edge_irq+0x1e/0x130 > <7>[ 150.944239] [] ? > __lock_acquire.isra.31+0x28f/0xa70 > <7>[ 150.944247] [] xhci_msi_irq+0x11/0x20 > <7>[ 150.944258] [] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x55/0x210 > <7>[ 150.944267] [] handle_irq_event+0x48/0x70 > <7>[ 150.944273] [] handle_edge_irq+0x77/0x130 > <7>[ 150.944283] [] handle_irq+0x60/0x150 > <7>[ 150.944293] [] ? > atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 > <7>[ 150.944302] [] do_IRQ+0x5a/0xe0 > <7>[ 150.944309] [] common_interrupt+0x6f/0x6f > <7>[ 150.944313] [] ? > cpuidle_wrap_enter+0x55/0xa0 > <7>[ 150.944327] [] ? cpuidle_wrap_enter+0x51/0xa0 > <7>[ 150.944334] [] cpuidle_enter_tk+0x10/0x20 > <7>[ 150.944341] [] cpuidle_idle_call+0xaf/0x2b0 > <7>[ 150.944350] [] cpu_idle+0xda/0x130 > <7>[ 150.944360] [] start_secondary+0x266/0x268 > <4>[ 150.944365] ---[ end trace 32319d39ebee5616 ]--- > > > You can see that it went through hid_ctrl(). > > From what I can gather using usbmon, the sensor hub sends the feature > report correctly. However, the in-kernel struct is not updated when the > report comes in. Therefore, the report from sensor_hub_report() is always > zero-filled. When calling sensor_hub_set_feature(), those zeros are being > sent back to the device. The feature report contains fields for power > state and reporting state. If they are set to zero, the firmware does not > know what to do as zero means undefined state. Both power and reporting > states have to be set for sensor to report values. Given the zero-filled > report, and we can only deal with one field in sensor_hub_set_feature(), > setting power state to non-zero also sends zero (i.e. undefined state) to > the reporting state field, and vice versa. > > The sensor hub on Acer Iconia W700 is using drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c. > I also played with Sony Vaio Duo 11 a while back (before having this > patch), and was having trouble turning on gyroscope. I suspect it is > caused by the same issue. The sensor hub on Acer is from STMicro, while > the one in Vaio Duo is from Freescale. Just to clarify a little bit on the issue. Although hid_ctrl() does not care the return value of hid_input_report(), the issue is within hid_input_report(). In drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1317 where raw_event() is called, if return is non-zero, the following call of hid_report_raw_event() is skipped. This call is needed to have the in-kernel struct updated with the actual feature report from device. Daniel