linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Whitlock <linux@mattwhitlock.name>
To: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@bitmath.org>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Input: bcm5974 - report ABS_MT_PRESSURE + remove redundant emulation code
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 15:35:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4086356.XLcl34THVt@crushinator> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559AD2CA.7000804@bitmath.org>

On Monday, 6 July 2015, at 9:11 pm, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> > It's been four weeks, and I haven't heard back on this patch. I believe I've
> > implemented what was requested. Is there a problem with it?
> 
> I thought you did get response on this patch set, concerning the fabrication of
> force data? I seem to remember a mail from Dmitry about this, although I cannot
> find it now.

I don't have anything from Dmitry at all, even in my spam box. Maybe he discussed it with you only?

> I think your patch is a good reduction, all in accord with what we talked about,
> but I have doubts that it will not create regressions. From what I have seen so
> far, patch-wise, the best solution is to leave the code as it is.

So you believe that the current (in-tree) behavior is superior to either of my attempts thus far to fix it?

> I understand that the constraints now seem to depict the empty set, but maybe
> there is a third solution.

Can you characterize what an acceptable solution would look like? The behavior of the code as it stands is really not acceptable; the MacBook Pro touchpad's buggy behavior in Linux is extremely frustrating, relative to its flawless behavior in OS X. My patchset has not introduced any regressions that I can observe, and in fact it has nearly eliminated the spurious drags. (I still get one occasionally, but maybe at a rate of ~1% as often as I was seeing them before.)

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-06 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-03 11:49 [PATCH] Input: bcm5974 - report highest finger pressure to Synaptics Matt Whitlock
2015-06-03 12:24 ` Henrik Rydberg
2015-06-03 12:31   ` Matt Whitlock
2015-06-03 12:52     ` Henrik Rydberg
2015-06-09  1:07       ` [PATCH 1/2] Input: input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(), rescale pressure + tool width Matt Whitlock
2015-06-09  1:07         ` [PATCH 2/2] Input: bcm5974 - report ABS_MT_PRESSURE + remove redundant emulation code Matt Whitlock
2015-07-06 18:37           ` Matt Whitlock
2015-07-06 19:11             ` Henrik Rydberg
2015-07-06 19:35               ` Matt Whitlock [this message]
2015-07-06 19:44                 ` Henrik Rydberg
2015-07-06 19:59                   ` Matt Whitlock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4086356.XLcl34THVt@crushinator \
    --to=linux@mattwhitlock.name \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rydberg@bitmath.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).