linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shem Multinymous" <multinymous@gmail.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ThinkPad input device IDs
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 14:12:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41840b750810081112p1c2e4071xd34f095091faa060@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081008134402.GA15645@khazad-dum.debian.net>

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<hmh@hmh.eng.br> wrote:
> I guess it used "isa1600" because it talks to the EC over LPC3B port IO, and
> the ports are in the 1600-161F range, over the LPC bus.

I see... But this is an ad-hoc port assignment by IBM and other
machines may map different devices to port 1600h. Is it presently
possible to write a udev rule that will match the (mainline) hdaps
input device but not random junk at port 1600 on other machines?


>> The out-of-tree tp_smapi version of hdaps followed the thinkpad-acpi
>> convention so it now conflicts with mainline hdaps. Which should I
>> follow?
>
> I think it is better to use the BUS_HOST convention for this, since HDAPS
> really is just one of the services on LPC3B even if LPC3B really *is*
> BUS_ISA, ports 1600-161F.  Dmitry would know better, though.  Dmitry?

For what it's worth, I should note that tp_smapi's hdaps input IDs
were introduced in July 2007 [1] and are by now in widespread use by
udev rules since they're needed for the reduced-interrupts mode of
hdaps+hdapsd [2].

  Shem

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.hdaps.devel/1040
[2] http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/HDAPS#Userspace_daemon)

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-08 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-08  4:44 ThinkPad input device IDs Shem Multinymous
2008-10-08 13:44 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-10-08 18:12   ` Shem Multinymous [this message]
2008-10-08 23:56     ` Dmitry Torokhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41840b750810081112p1c2e4071xd34f095091faa060@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=multinymous@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).