From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] WM97xx updates Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:29:03 +0100 Message-ID: <49AE65FF.2060309@atmel.com> References: <20090303182402.GA29542@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <20090304091538.GD7394@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> <49AE492F.6020006@atmel.com> <20090304105358.GA32107@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from relay.atmel.no ([80.232.32.139]:56381 "EHLO relay.atmel.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751903AbZCDL3W (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:29:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090304105358.GA32107@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Jiri Slaby , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hans-Christian Egtvedt Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:26:07AM +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > >> The only thing catched by review was a leaking irq line, do you plan to >> fixup that Mark? > > Jiri also had some further comments from the initial posting (mail > attached). I can probably try to fix up most things blind but I'll need > to at least set up an at32 toolchain to build test. The workqueue thing > might be better to test on hardware, though, just in case there's some > noticable performance impact. I wouldn't expect so but it'd be safer. > I'll see what I can manage to squeeze in of testing, there is always the in-between-time. What is this patch based against? Linus tree, master branch? -- Best regards, Hans-Christian Egtvedt