From: Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@iki.fi>
To: ext-jari.vanhala@nokia.com
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
"linux-input@vger.kernel.org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: Add direction to ff-memless
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:15:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B1EFA2A.6000403@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260263284.19783.1758.camel@tema>
Jari Vanhala wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 22:16 +0100, ext Anssi Hannula wrote:
>> Jari Vanhala wrote:
>>> +static unsigned int ml_calculate_direction(
>>> + unsigned int direction, unsigned int force,
>>> + unsigned int new_direction, unsigned int new_force)
>>> +{
>>> + return ((u32)direction * force + new_direction * new_force) /
>>> + (force + new_force);
>>> +}
>> What if direction is 0xf000 and new_direction is 0x1000? The correct
>> behaviour would be to use direction 0x0000 or so, but this code would
>> return 0x8000 (assuming equal forces).
>
> I know it's not perfect, but it's simple and gives good enough result.
> And I just need to know which side of 0x8000 it is.
Ah, I assumed the motor directions (forward, reverse) were mapped to
up/down (180/0), not left/right.
Your way seems somewhat counter-intuitive, but it indeed makes
ml_calculate_direction() simpler :) And as there are no other rumble
drivers using the direction field, I guess the wrong results do not
matter, then.
I think a comment should be added in ml_calculate_direction(), anyway,
to make it clear that it only works correctly with motors with
left/right directions only.
--
Anssi Hannula
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-09 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-04 13:05 [PATCH] Input: Add direction to ff-memless Jari Vanhala
2009-12-04 13:05 ` [PATCH] Input: Force Feedback core memory leak Jari Vanhala
2009-12-07 6:26 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-07 21:16 ` [PATCH] Input: Add direction to ff-memless Anssi Hannula
2009-12-08 9:08 ` Jari Vanhala
2009-12-09 1:15 ` Anssi Hannula [this message]
2009-12-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Jari Vanhala
2009-12-24 23:37 ` Anssi Hannula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B1EFA2A.6000403@iki.fi \
--to=anssi.hannula@iki.fi \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=ext-jari.vanhala@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).