From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Henrik Rydberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3] elantech: Report multitouch with proper ABS_MT messages Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 02:48:48 +0200 Message-ID: <4BE8A970.104@bitmath.org> References: <4BE593AA.6040408@tudelft.nl> <4BE86886.2080909@tudelft.nl> <4BE8725D.1060703@euromail.se> <4BE8886D.4040302@tudelft.nl> <4BE89DB3.1050206@euromail.se> <20100511001121.GB21081@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from csmtp2.one.com ([91.198.169.22]:56784 "EHLO csmtp2.one.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755754Ab0EKAsw (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2010 20:48:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100511001121.GB21081@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Henrik Rydberg , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C9ric_Piel?= , Florian Ragwitz , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Do not worry about the 80 char limit that much, especially if it > produces less readable code due to wierd line splits. The code above > could be broken cleanly, but it's not a big deal. > > The rest of the checkpatch warnirngs (if any) I prefer to have > addressed though. Fair enough, ACK on the content of both patches, and thanks Eric for your patience. Henrik