From: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Ping Cheng <pinglinux@gmail.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, Ping Cheng <pingc@wacom.com>,
Benjamin Tissoires <tissoire@cena.fr>,
Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>,
Rafi Rubin <rafi@seas.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] input: Use driver hint to compute the evdev buffer size (rev3)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:27:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C22441D.8000705@euromail.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100623171206.GA11512@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 07:07:44PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> Hi Ping,
>> [...]
>>>> @@ -51,7 +52,9 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(evdev_table_mutex);
>>>>
>>>> static int evdev_compute_buffer_size(struct input_dev *dev)
>>>> {
>>>> - return EVDEV_MIN_BUFFER_SIZE;
>>>> + int nev = dev->hint_events_per_packet * EVDEV_BUF_PACKETS;
>>>> + nev = max(nev, EVDEV_MIN_BUFFER_SIZE);
>>>> + return roundup_pow_of_two(nev);
>>> I think we have a backward compatibility issue here. This routine will
>>> return 7 when nev falls to the default value
>>> (EVDEV_MIN_BUFFER_SIZE/64). This could happen to those drivers that
>>> don't report MT events or forget/don't feel the need to set
>>> hint_events_per_packet since the old BUFFER_SIZE worked perfectly for
>>> them. We need to keep the return value for those drivers as 64 so we
>>> could allocate the same space as it was in [PATCH 1/5].
>> Are you perhaps confusing EVDEV_BUF_PACKETS and EVDEV_MIN_BUFFER_SIZE? The last
>> line ensures that the value returned is a power of two (hence not 7). The
>> second-to-last line ensures the value is at least equal to 64 (hence not 7). The
>> default hint value for a driver that does not do anything is zero, which leads
>> to a return value of 64, just as it is today.
>>
>
> I think Ping might have confused roundup_pow_of_two() with
> get_order()-type function...
>
> Anyways, applied all 5, thanks Henrik.
>
Got them, thanks to you too.
Henrik
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-23 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-23 11:14 [PATCH 0/4] input: evdev: Dynamic buffers (rev5) Henrik Rydberg
2010-06-23 11:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] input: evdev: Convert to dynamic event buffer (rev5) Henrik Rydberg
2010-06-23 11:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] input: Use driver hint to compute the evdev buffer size (rev3) Henrik Rydberg
2010-06-23 11:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] input: bcm5974: Set the average number of events per MT event packet Henrik Rydberg
2010-06-23 11:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] hid-input: Use a larger event buffer for MT devices Henrik Rydberg
2010-06-23 11:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] input: evdev: Never leave the client buffer empty after write Henrik Rydberg
2010-06-23 14:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] hid-input: Use a larger event buffer for MT devices Jiri Kosina
2010-06-23 16:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] input: Use driver hint to compute the evdev buffer size (rev3) Ping Cheng
2010-06-23 17:07 ` Henrik Rydberg
2010-06-23 17:12 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-06-23 17:27 ` Henrik Rydberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C22441D.8000705@euromail.se \
--to=rydberg@euromail.se \
--cc=chase.douglas@canonical.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pingc@wacom.com \
--cc=pinglinux@gmail.com \
--cc=rafi@seas.upenn.edu \
--cc=tissoire@cena.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).