From: Trilok Soni <tsoni@codeaurora.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
wruan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 4/6] input: pmic8058_pwrkey: Add support for power key
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:26:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDD013C.6050709@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101112005741.GC17097@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Hi Dmitry,
On 11/12/2010 6:27 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:30:21PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> On 11/11/2010 12:51 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> Hi Trilkok,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 06:17:59PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote:
>>>> Add support for PMIC8058 power key driven over dedicated KYPD_PWR_N
>>>> pin. It allows the user to specify the amount of time by which the
>>>> power key reporting can be delayed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why do we need to delay KEY_POWER reporting? Do we need to use high
>>> resolution timers or regular timers would do as well? KEY_END
>>> appears to be abused (you don't want to move your cursor to the end
>>> of line, do you?). Also I wonder if header file should reside in
>>> linux/mfd with the rest of pmic8058 components.
>>
>> Most of the time Mobile devices come with single physical key for
>> POWER, which if pressed for less than 500ms (configurable) then it
>> will only report KEY_END (which say locks the screen on mobile) and if
>> it pressed more than 500ms then it will also report KEY_POWER event
>> too, which will say display menu on your mobile for asking you to
>> suspend/switch off/etc, operations.
>>
>
> I see,. If you would have used KEY_SCREENLOCK iinstead of KEY_END I
> would likely not ask this question ;)
>
KEY_SCRENNLOCK looks good, let me analyze the impact on userspace framework
which I have. I will come back on this in a day.
>> For the timers I can move from hrtimers to regular timers.
>>
>> For the header file, I can move them to include/linux/mfd too. No
>> problem on that.
>>
>
> I am not even sure we need to keep them in separate header files, but it
> is up to you.
Do you suggest that all the MFD sub-devices's platform data structures should come from single
header file?
---Trilok Soni
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-12 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-10 12:47 [RFC v1 PATCH 0/6] Qualcomm PMIC8058 sub-device drivers Trilok Soni
2010-11-10 12:47 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 1/6] matrix_keypad: Increase the max limit of rows and columns Trilok Soni
2010-11-10 18:33 ` Eric Miao
2010-11-10 23:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-11-17 17:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-11-10 12:47 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 2/6] input: pm8058_keypad: Qualcomm PMIC8058 keypad controller driver Trilok Soni
2010-11-16 3:49 ` Trilok Soni
2010-11-17 18:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-12-06 18:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-12-07 9:22 ` Trilok Soni
2010-12-07 9:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-12-07 9:32 ` Trilok Soni
2011-01-06 11:56 ` [rtc-linux] " Anirudh Ghayal
2010-11-10 12:47 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 3/6] led: pmic8058: Add PMIC8058 leds driver Trilok Soni
2010-11-10 20:45 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-10 23:28 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-11-10 23:50 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-11 12:15 ` Trilok Soni
2010-12-06 13:44 ` Trilok Soni
2010-12-07 15:11 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-12-07 15:47 ` Trilok Soni
2010-11-10 12:47 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 4/6] input: pmic8058_pwrkey: Add support for power key Trilok Soni
2010-11-11 7:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-11-11 12:00 ` Trilok Soni
2010-11-12 0:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-11-12 8:56 ` Trilok Soni [this message]
2010-11-12 19:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-11-10 12:48 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 5/6] input: pmic8058-othc: Add support for PM8058 based OTHC Trilok Soni
2010-11-16 3:08 ` Trilok Soni
2010-11-16 5:36 ` Datta, Shubhrajyoti
2010-11-16 6:36 ` Trilok Soni
2010-12-01 5:34 ` Anirudh Ghayal
2010-12-07 10:04 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-12-07 12:10 ` Anirudh Ghayal
2010-11-10 12:48 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 6/6] drivers: rtc: Add support for Qualcomm PMIC8058 RTC Trilok Soni
2010-11-12 8:53 ` Trilok Soni
2010-11-12 12:53 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-12 15:17 ` [rtc-linux] " Anirudh Ghayal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDD013C.6050709@codeaurora.org \
--to=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=wruan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).