Re: [RFC] Input: define separate EVIOCGKEYCODE_V2/EVIOCSKEYCODE_V2

[Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se>]

On 12/09/2010 10:39 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

> The desire to keep old names for the EVIOCGKEYCODE/EVIOCSKEYCODE while
> extending them to support large scancodes was a mistake. While we tried
> to keep ABI intact (and we succeeded in doing that, programs compiled
> on older kernels will work on newer ones) there is still a problem with
> recompiling existing software with newer kernel headers.
> 
> New kernel headers will supply updated ioctl numbers and kernel will
> expect that userspace will use struct input_keymap_entry to set and
> retrieve keymap data. But since the names of ioctls are still the same
> userspace will happily compile even if not adjusted to make use of the
> new structure and will start miraculously fail in the field.
> 
> To avoid this issue let's revert EVIOCGKEYCODE/EVIOCSKEYCODE definitions
> and add EVIOCGKEYCODE_V2/EVIOCSKEYCODE_V2 so that userspace can explicitly
> select the style of ioctls it wants to employ.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
> ---


Would the header change suffice in itself? Either way, also checked that the
bugfixes following the original patch is still in effect, so looks ok to me.

Henrik