From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Henrik Rydberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] input: mt: Add button support for five fingers Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:00:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4D05D299.60106@euromail.se> References: <1292063308-15327-1-git-send-email-rydberg@euromail.se> <1292063308-15327-2-git-send-email-rydberg@euromail.se> <20101213025016.GC21401@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]:56160 "EHLO ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752828Ab0LMIAj (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 03:00:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20101213025016.GC21401@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Jiri Kosina , Ping Cheng , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/13/2010 03:50 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:28:28AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote: >> This patch adds BTN_TOOL_QUINTAP to be used by hardware reporting >> finger counts different from the number of MT contacts. > > I must say this is quite ugly, but so is introducing ABS_CONTACT_COUNT > or similar, except that the latter is more extensible so if > manufacturers decide to report 6, 7, 8 fingers (but not their > coordinates) we won't have to breed BTN_TOOL_xxxTAPs... > > But let me ask you this: do we know what to do with 5 fingers? How do we > plan to react to such gestures? Maybe the best option is simply ignore > it and don't report anything if there are no userspace consumers? I agree - let's put the bar at four fingers for special solutions. Dropped. Thanks, Henrik