* Re: ad714x driver help and possible bug
[not found] <62821D7C-1637-4F7E-A53A-F52AEB2A6C87@gmail.com>
@ 2011-04-29 9:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
[not found] ` <4DBAD0AC.3010608@analog.com>
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2011-04-29 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jean-Francois Dagenais
Cc: Barry Song, linux-kernel,
device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Hennerich, Michael
Cc'd input, and analog devices driver list...
On 04/28/11 19:17, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am having trouble getting the ad714x (i2c) driver to work in my
> test setup. I am using the VGA i2c bus to talk to the ad7147 I have.
> I used INTA of a PCI ethernet slot in my PC. I enabled the PCI device
> without the driver module loaded. I then give the interrupt number
> to ad714x through the struct i2c_board_info. I actually tried the
> same setup on two PCs, one intel graphics, the other nvidia to
> eliminate the i2c master as a possible cause of my problem.
>
> The device is successfully loaded and I can see the interrupts going.
> The eventN device created under /dev/input never spit out anything
> and so I added printks in the threaded ISR handler to see what is
> going on.
>
> I only have a wheel with 8 stages. In ad714x_wheel_state_machine() I
> see that upon the first interrupt, the state goes from IDLE to
> JITTER. After this the JITTER case checks that c_state == mask (with
> mask being 0xff in our case). This condition is never met and the
> driver stays indefinitely in this state. After lifting my finger from
> the wheel, the chip settles down to scanning every so many
> milliseconds.
>
> The STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS is always 0 when my finger is off, but
> varies a lot while my finger is on (while interrupt frequency is
> high). Looking at the value of STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS in binary
> reveals that the set bits are always in groups, e.g. 0x0007 or 0x001C
> or 0x0081(I imagine a roll-over of our start_stage-end_stage (0-7)).
> There seems to be a timing aspect here. I added a spin counter in the
> threaded ISR to delay reading the 3 registers and that seemed to make
> the c_state change a little.
>
> I modified the code that reads the 3 registers right after the
> mutex_lock in ad714x_interrupt_thread so that the
> STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS is read before the other two (LOW and HIGH
> regs). The result was surprising. The COMPLETE reg did read 0xff now
> and the JITTER case went past the "if(c_state == mask)" but later
> crashed (divide by 0) in ad714x_wheel_cal_abs_pos() called from the
> JITTER case.
>
>
> Here's the initial configuration I give the driver:
>
> static struct ad714x_wheel_plat wheel_platform_data = {
> .start_stage = 0, // int start_stage;
> .end_stage = 7, // int end_stage;
> .max_coord = 128, // int max_coord;
> };
>
> static struct ad714x_platform_data wheel_dev_platform_data = {
> .slider_num = 0,
> .wheel_num = 1,
> .touchpad_num = 0,
> .button_num = 0,
> .slider = 0,
> .wheel = &wheel_platform_data, // struct ad714x_wheel_plat *wheel;
> .touchpad = 0, // struct ad714x_touchpad_plat *touchpad;
> .button = 0, // struct ad714x_button_plat *button;
> .stage_cfg_reg = { /* unsigned short stage_cfg_reg[STAGE_NUM][STAGE_CFGREG_NUM] */
> {0xfffe, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
> {0xfffb, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
> {0xffef, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
> {0xffbf, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
> {0xfeff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
> {0xfbff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
> {0xefff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
> {0xffff, 0x3ffe, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>
> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
> },
> .sys_cfg_reg = {0x027e, 0x00ff, 0x3233, 0x0819, 0x0832, 0x0000, 0x00ff, 0}, /* unsigned short sys_cfg_reg[SYS_CFGREG_NUM] */
> //.sys_cfg_reg = {0x2b2, 0xfff, 0x3233, 0x819, 0x832, 0xcff, 0xcff, 0x0}, /* unsigned short sys_cfg_reg[SYS_CFGREG_NUM] */
> };
>
>
> I also had to change the request_threaded_irq flags to specify
> IRQF_ONESHOT so the kernel keeps the interrupt masked while we are
> running ad714x_interrupt_thread(). Otherwise we were getting storms
> of interrupts each time only one was requested. I am wondering if
> this should be pulled back to the mainline kernel?
>
> Thanks for pointers and clues!
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ad714x driver help and possible bug
[not found] ` <4DBAD0AC.3010608@analog.com>
@ 2011-04-29 14:58 ` Michael Hennerich
2011-05-02 20:43 ` Jean-Francois Dagenais
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Hennerich @ 2011-04-29 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jean-Francois Dagenais
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Barry Song, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org
On 04/29/2011 04:52 PM, Michael Hennerich wrote:
> On 04/29/2011 11:55 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> Cc'd input, and analog devices driver list...
>>
>> On 04/28/11 19:17, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I also had to change the request_threaded_irq flags to specify
>>> IRQF_ONESHOT so the kernel keeps the interrupt masked while we are
>>> running ad714x_interrupt_thread(). Otherwise we were getting storms
>>> of interrupts each time only one was requested. I am wondering if
>>> this should be pulled back to the mainline kernel?
>>>
>>> Thanks for pointers and clues!
>>>
>>>
> I assume this is due to the fact that the interrupt on the host is
> level sensitive.
> In this case you need to use the IRQF_ONESHOT flag.
> The unmodified driver requests the IRQ as IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, so
> this is not necessary.
>
> To my knowledge we regularly test the driver with the sliders, wheels
> and buttons found on the
> official evaluation board, and so far we haven't found oddities.
> For an example platform file see: arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c
> From top of my head I don't know whether we're testing with the SPI or
> I2C interface.
>
> http://wiki.analog.com/software/driver/linux/ad714x
>
--
Greetings,
Michael
--
Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Muenchen; Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 40368;
Geschaeftsfuehrer:Dr.Carsten Suckrow, Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin,
Margaret Seif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ad714x driver help and possible bug
2011-04-29 14:58 ` Michael Hennerich
@ 2011-05-02 20:43 ` Jean-Francois Dagenais
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jean-Francois Dagenais @ 2011-05-02 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Hennerich
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Barry Song, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org
On Apr 29, 2011, at 10:58, Michael Hennerich wrote:
> On 04/29/2011 04:52 PM, Michael Hennerich wrote:
>> On 04/29/2011 11:55 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> Cc'd input, and analog devices driver list...
>>>
>>> On 04/28/11 19:17, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I also had to change the request_threaded_irq flags to specify
>>>> IRQF_ONESHOT so the kernel keeps the interrupt masked while we are
>>>> running ad714x_interrupt_thread(). Otherwise we were getting storms
>>>> of interrupts each time only one was requested. I am wondering if
>>>> this should be pulled back to the mainline kernel?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for pointers and clues!
>>>>
>>>>
>> I assume this is due to the fact that the interrupt on the host is
>> level sensitive.
>> In this case you need to use the IRQF_ONESHOT flag.
>> The unmodified driver requests the IRQ as IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, so
>> this is not necessary.
I succeeded in making the ISR occur only once per real interrupt, the problem I explained earlier remains.
>>
>> To my knowledge we regularly test the driver with the sliders, wheels
>> and buttons found on the
>> official evaluation board, and so far we haven't found oddities.
>> For an example platform file see: arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c
>> From top of my head I don't know whether we're testing with the SPI or
>> I2C interface.
>>
>> http://wiki.analog.com/software/driver/linux/ad714x
>>
> --
>
> Greetings,
> Michael
>
> --
> Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Muenchen; Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 40368;
> Geschaeftsfuehrer:Dr.Carsten Suckrow, Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin,
> Margaret Seif
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ad714x driver help and possible bug
2011-04-29 9:55 ` ad714x driver help and possible bug Jonathan Cameron
[not found] ` <4DBAD0AC.3010608@analog.com>
@ 2011-05-03 14:13 ` Jean-Francois Dagenais
[not found] ` <A89A87E2-E4C4-4DD7-9E51-9FD38D93DC0E@gmail.com>
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jean-Francois Dagenais @ 2011-05-03 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron, Barry Song, linux-kernel, device-drivers-devel,
Michael Hennerich
Cc: Yves.Lapointe, Adrian.Flanagan, Susan.Pratt
On Apr 29, 2011, at 5:55, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Cc'd input, and analog devices driver list...
>
> On 04/28/11 19:17, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am having trouble getting the ad714x (i2c) driver to work in my
>> test setup. I am using the VGA i2c bus to talk to the ad7147 I have.
>> I used INTA of a PCI ethernet slot in my PC. I enabled the PCI device
>> without the driver module loaded. I then give the interrupt number
>> to ad714x through the struct i2c_board_info. I actually tried the
>> same setup on two PCs, one intel graphics, the other nvidia to
>> eliminate the i2c master as a possible cause of my problem.
>>
>> The device is successfully loaded and I can see the interrupts going.
>> The eventN device created under /dev/input never spit out anything
>> and so I added printks in the threaded ISR handler to see what is
>> going on.
>>
>> I only have a wheel with 8 stages. In ad714x_wheel_state_machine() I
>> see that upon the first interrupt, the state goes from IDLE to
>> JITTER. After this the JITTER case checks that c_state == mask (with
>> mask being 0xff in our case). This condition is never met and the
>> driver stays indefinitely in this state. After lifting my finger from
>> the wheel, the chip settles down to scanning every so many
>> milliseconds.
>>
>> The STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS is always 0 when my finger is off, but
>> varies a lot while my finger is on (while interrupt frequency is
>> high). Looking at the value of STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS in binary
>> reveals that the set bits are always in groups, e.g. 0x0007 or 0x001C
>> or 0x0081(I imagine a roll-over of our start_stage-end_stage (0-7)).
>> There seems to be a timing aspect here. I added a spin counter in the
>> threaded ISR to delay reading the 3 registers and that seemed to make
>> the c_state change a little.
>>
>> I modified the code that reads the 3 registers right after the
>> mutex_lock in ad714x_interrupt_thread so that the
>> STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS is read before the other two (LOW and HIGH
>> regs). The result was surprising. The COMPLETE reg did read 0xff now
>> and the JITTER case went past the "if(c_state == mask)" but later
>> crashed (divide by 0) in ad714x_wheel_cal_abs_pos() called from the
>> JITTER case.
>>
>>
>> Here's the initial configuration I give the driver:
>>
>> static struct ad714x_wheel_plat wheel_platform_data = {
>> .start_stage = 0, // int start_stage;
>> .end_stage = 7, // int end_stage;
>> .max_coord = 128, // int max_coord;
>> };
>>
>> static struct ad714x_platform_data wheel_dev_platform_data = {
>> .slider_num = 0,
>> .wheel_num = 1,
>> .touchpad_num = 0,
>> .button_num = 0,
>> .slider = 0,
>> .wheel = &wheel_platform_data, // struct ad714x_wheel_plat *wheel;
>> .touchpad = 0, // struct ad714x_touchpad_plat *touchpad;
>> .button = 0, // struct ad714x_button_plat *button;
>> .stage_cfg_reg = { /* unsigned short stage_cfg_reg[STAGE_NUM][STAGE_CFGREG_NUM] */
>> {0xfffe, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>> {0xfffb, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>> {0xffef, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>> {0xffbf, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>> {0xfeff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>> {0xfbff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>> {0xefff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>> {0xffff, 0x3ffe, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>
>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>> },
>> .sys_cfg_reg = {0x027e, 0x00ff, 0x3233, 0x0819, 0x0832, 0x0000, 0x00ff, 0}, /* unsigned short sys_cfg_reg[SYS_CFGREG_NUM] */
>> //.sys_cfg_reg = {0x2b2, 0xfff, 0x3233, 0x819, 0x832, 0xcff, 0xcff, 0x0}, /* unsigned short sys_cfg_reg[SYS_CFGREG_NUM] */
>> };
>>
>
>>
>> I also had to change the request_threaded_irq flags to specify
>> IRQF_ONESHOT so the kernel keeps the interrupt masked while we are
>> running ad714x_interrupt_thread(). Otherwise we were getting storms
>> of interrupts each time only one was requested. I am wondering if
>> this should be pulled back to the mainline kernel?
>>
>> Thanks for pointers and clues!
>>
>
here's the printk I added to ad714x_wheel_state_machine()
mask = ((1 << (hw->end_stage + 1)) - 1) - ((1 << hw->start_stage) - 1);
h_state = ad714x->h_state & mask;
c_state = ad714x->c_state & mask;
dev_dbg(ad714x->dev, "interrupt state:%d mask:0x%x l:0x%x h:0x%x c:0x%x\n",
sw->state,
(u32)mask,
(u32)ad714x->l_state,
(u32)ad714x->h_state,
(u32)ad714x->c_state);
Here what it looks like upon loading a module which does the i2c_new_device of the AD7147:
<7>[58302.186886] my-pci-stub 0000:01:04.0: claimed by my platform module PCI stub
<6>[58302.186903] my-pci-stub 0000:01:04.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
<6>[58302.189815] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: found AD7147(A) captouch, rev:1
<6>[58302.427237] input: Unspecified device as /devices/virtual/input/input8
[ pause here while my hand goes from my mouse and keyboard to the wheel on the AD7147 ]
<7>[58311.646183] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:0 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x1c
<7>[58311.646192] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: case IDLE in if
<7>[58311.655436] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: wheel 0 touched
<7>[58311.663087] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x7
<7>[58311.674562] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
<7>[58311.686803] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
<7>[58311.699147] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
<7>[58311.711430] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
<7>[58311.723585] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
<7>[58311.736017] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
<7>[58311.748298] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
<7>[58311.760581] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
<7>[58311.772800] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
<7>[58311.785176] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
<7>[58311.797473] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
<7>[58311.809651] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x10 c:0x81
[ here I lift my finger ]
<7>[58311.822059] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
<7>[58311.834345] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
<7>[58311.846582] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
<7>[58311.858800] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
<7>[58311.871212] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
<7>[58311.883517] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
<7>[58311.895802] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
<7>[58311.908099] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
<7>[58311.920381] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
<7>[58311.932585] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
[...]
<7>[58313.432218] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
<7>[58314.157343] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
[... after 2 seconds or so, the rhythm slows down to 2 interrupts per second or so ]
<7>[58314.169629] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x80
<7>[58314.976518] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x80
<7>[58315.783342] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x80
There is a clue in what I did next. I added a wait time in the isr thread function like so:
static irqreturn_t ad714x_interrupt_thread(int irq, void *data)
{
struct ad714x_chip *ad714x = data;
volatile int i;
mutex_lock(&ad714x->mutex);
i=0xffffff;
while(i)
--i;
ad714x->read(ad714x->dev, STG_LOW_INT_STA_REG, &ad714x->l_state);
ad714x->read(ad714x->dev, STG_HIGH_INT_STA_REG, &ad714x->h_state);
ad714x->read(ad714x->dev, STG_COM_INT_STA_REG, &ad714x->c_state);
[ ... ]
this changes the above trace to these values:
while touching the wheel:
<7>[63085.414268] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:0 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x60
<7>[63085.414277] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: case IDLE in if
<7>[63085.423519] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: wheel 0 touched
<7>[63085.578931] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x18
<7>[63085.736079] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x3
<7>[63085.832304] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x60
<7>[63086.938334] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x30 c:0x60
<7>[63087.030835] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
<7>[63087.122909] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
<7>[63087.215014] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
<7>[63087.307071] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
<7>[63087.399367] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
<7>[63087.739386] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x83
Again, notice the state going from 0 (IDLE) to 1(JITTER), and never entering the "if" in the JITTER case (needs mask == c_state). The HIGH register varies a lot while I move my finger around, but the COMPLETE looks like its always going and being cleared. I mentioned before that reading the COMPLETE status reg before the LOW and HIGH produces completely different results.
I am suspecting the register configuration we use is off somehow, I will review them thoroughly. Aside from this we are running out of leads here, anyone has input on this?
Thanks in advance!
JFD
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ad714x driver help and possible bug
[not found] ` <A89A87E2-E4C4-4DD7-9E51-9FD38D93DC0E@gmail.com>
@ 2011-05-03 14:33 ` Michael Hennerich
2011-05-03 15:16 ` Michael Hennerich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Hennerich @ 2011-05-03 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jean-Francois Dagenais
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Barry Song, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Lapointe, Yves, Flanagan, Adrian,
Pratt, Susan
On 05/03/2011 04:13 PM, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2011, at 5:55, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
>
>> Cc'd input, and analog devices driver list...
>>
>> On 04/28/11 19:17, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am having trouble getting the ad714x (i2c) driver to work in my
>>> test setup. I am using the VGA i2c bus to talk to the ad7147 I have.
>>> I used INTA of a PCI ethernet slot in my PC. I enabled the PCI device
>>> without the driver module loaded. I then give the interrupt number
>>> to ad714x through the struct i2c_board_info. I actually tried the
>>> same setup on two PCs, one intel graphics, the other nvidia to
>>> eliminate the i2c master as a possible cause of my problem.
>>>
>>> The device is successfully loaded and I can see the interrupts going.
>>> The eventN device created under /dev/input never spit out anything
>>> and so I added printks in the threaded ISR handler to see what is
>>> going on.
>>>
>>> I only have a wheel with 8 stages. In ad714x_wheel_state_machine() I
>>> see that upon the first interrupt, the state goes from IDLE to
>>> JITTER. After this the JITTER case checks that c_state == mask (with
>>> mask being 0xff in our case). This condition is never met and the
>>> driver stays indefinitely in this state. After lifting my finger from
>>> the wheel, the chip settles down to scanning every so many
>>> milliseconds.
>>>
>>> The STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS is always 0 when my finger is off, but
>>> varies a lot while my finger is on (while interrupt frequency is
>>> high). Looking at the value of STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS in binary
>>> reveals that the set bits are always in groups, e.g. 0x0007 or 0x001C
>>> or 0x0081(I imagine a roll-over of our start_stage-end_stage (0-7)).
>>> There seems to be a timing aspect here. I added a spin counter in the
>>> threaded ISR to delay reading the 3 registers and that seemed to make
>>> the c_state change a little.
>>>
>>> I modified the code that reads the 3 registers right after the
>>> mutex_lock in ad714x_interrupt_thread so that the
>>> STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS is read before the other two (LOW and HIGH
>>> regs). The result was surprising. The COMPLETE reg did read 0xff now
>>> and the JITTER case went past the "if(c_state == mask)" but later
>>> crashed (divide by 0) in ad714x_wheel_cal_abs_pos() called from the
>>> JITTER case.
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's the initial configuration I give the driver:
>>>
>>> static struct ad714x_wheel_plat wheel_platform_data = {
>>> .start_stage = 0, // int start_stage;
>>> .end_stage = 7, // int end_stage;
>>> .max_coord = 128, // int max_coord;
>>> };
>>>
>>> static struct ad714x_platform_data wheel_dev_platform_data = {
>>> .slider_num = 0,
>>> .wheel_num = 1,
>>> .touchpad_num = 0,
>>> .button_num = 0,
>>> .slider = 0,
>>> .wheel = &wheel_platform_data, // struct ad714x_wheel_plat *wheel;
>>> .touchpad = 0, // struct ad714x_touchpad_plat *touchpad;
>>> .button = 0, // struct ad714x_button_plat *button;
>>> .stage_cfg_reg = { /* unsigned short stage_cfg_reg[STAGE_NUM][STAGE_CFGREG_NUM] */
>>> {0xfffe, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>> {0xfffb, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>> {0xffef, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>> {0xffbf, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>> {0xfeff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>> {0xfbff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>> {0xefff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>> {0xffff, 0x3ffe, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>
>>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>>> },
>>> .sys_cfg_reg = {0x027e, 0x00ff, 0x3233, 0x0819, 0x0832, 0x0000, 0x00ff, 0}, /* unsigned short sys_cfg_reg[SYS_CFGREG_NUM] */
>>> //.sys_cfg_reg = {0x2b2, 0xfff, 0x3233, 0x819, 0x832, 0xcff, 0xcff, 0x0}, /* unsigned short sys_cfg_reg[SYS_CFGREG_NUM] */
>>> };
>>>
>>>
>>
>>> I also had to change the request_threaded_irq flags to specify
>>> IRQF_ONESHOT so the kernel keeps the interrupt masked while we are
>>> running ad714x_interrupt_thread(). Otherwise we were getting storms
>>> of interrupts each time only one was requested. I am wondering if
>>> this should be pulled back to the mainline kernel?
>>>
>>> Thanks for pointers and clues!
>>>
>>>
>>
> here's the printk I added to ad714x_wheel_state_machine()
>
> mask = ((1 << (hw->end_stage + 1)) - 1) - ((1 << hw->start_stage) - 1);
>
> h_state = ad714x->h_state & mask;
> c_state = ad714x->c_state & mask;
> dev_dbg(ad714x->dev, "interrupt state:%d mask:0x%x l:0x%x h:0x%x c:0x%x\n",
> sw->state,
> (u32)mask,
> (u32)ad714x->l_state,
> (u32)ad714x->h_state,
> (u32)ad714x->c_state);
>
> Here what it looks like upon loading a module which does the i2c_new_device of the AD7147:
>
> <7>[58302.186886] my-pci-stub 0000:01:04.0: claimed by my platform module PCI stub
> <6>[58302.186903] my-pci-stub 0000:01:04.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
> <6>[58302.189815] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: found AD7147(A) captouch, rev:1
> <6>[58302.427237] input: Unspecified device as /devices/virtual/input/input8
>
> [ pause here while my hand goes from my mouse and keyboard to the wheel on the AD7147 ]
>
> <7>[58311.646183] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:0 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x1c
> <7>[58311.646192] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: case IDLE in if
> <7>[58311.655436] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: wheel 0 touched
> <7>[58311.663087] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x7
> <7>[58311.674562] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.686803] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.699147] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.711430] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.723585] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.736017] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.748298] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.760581] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.772800] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.785176] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.797473] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.809651] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x10 c:0x81
>
> [ here I lift my finger ]
>
> <7>[58311.822059] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.834345] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.846582] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.858800] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.871212] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.883517] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.895802] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.908099] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.920381] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
> <7>[58311.932585] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>
> [...]
>
> <7>[58313.432218] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
> <7>[58314.157343] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>
> [... after 2 seconds or so, the rhythm slows down to 2 interrupts per second or so ]
>
> <7>[58314.169629] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x80
>
> <7>[58314.976518] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x80
>
> <7>[58315.783342] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x80
>
>
> There is a clue in what I did next. I added a wait time in the isr thread function like so:
>
> static irqreturn_t ad714x_interrupt_thread(int irq, void *data)
> {
> struct ad714x_chip *ad714x = data;
> volatile int i;
>
> mutex_lock(&ad714x->mutex);
>
> i=0xffffff;
> while(i)
> --i;
>
> ad714x->read(ad714x->dev, STG_LOW_INT_STA_REG, &ad714x->l_state);
> ad714x->read(ad714x->dev, STG_HIGH_INT_STA_REG, &ad714x->h_state);
> ad714x->read(ad714x->dev, STG_COM_INT_STA_REG, &ad714x->c_state);
> [ ... ]
>
> this changes the above trace to these values:
>
> while touching the wheel:
> <7>[63085.414268] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:0 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x60
> <7>[63085.414277] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: case IDLE in if
> <7>[63085.423519] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: wheel 0 touched
> <7>[63085.578931] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x18
> <7>[63085.736079] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x3
> <7>[63085.832304] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x60
> <7>[63086.938334] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x30 c:0x60
> <7>[63087.030835] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
> <7>[63087.122909] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
> <7>[63087.215014] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
> <7>[63087.307071] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
> <7>[63087.399367] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
> <7>[63087.739386] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x83
>
> Again, notice the state going from 0 (IDLE) to 1(JITTER), and never entering the "if" in the JITTER case (needs mask == c_state). The HIGH register varies a lot while I move my finger around, but the COMPLETE looks like its always going and being cleared. I mentioned before that reading the COMPLETE status reg before the LOW and HIGH produces completely different results.
>
> I am suspecting the register configuration we use is off somehow, I will review them thoroughly. Aside from this we are running out of leads here, anyone has input on this?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> JFD
>
Hi Jean-Francois,
Barry Song, the driver author left ADI quite some time ago
I don't have hardware to test things at the moment.
The EVAL-AD7147 only has sliders and buttons, so I don't know how useful
it will be here.
Need to check if I can find one having a wheel.
--
Greetings,
Michael
--
Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Muenchen; Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 40368;
Geschaeftsfuehrer:Dr.Carsten Suckrow, Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin,
Margaret Seif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ad714x driver help and possible bug
2011-05-03 14:33 ` Michael Hennerich
@ 2011-05-03 15:16 ` Michael Hennerich
2011-05-03 23:50 ` Jean-François Dagenais
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Hennerich @ 2011-05-03 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hennerich, Michael
Cc: Jean-Francois Dagenais, Jonathan Cameron, Barry Song,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Lapointe, Yves, Flanagan, Adrian,
Pratt, Susan
On 05/03/2011 04:33 PM, Michael Hennerich wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 04:13 PM, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
>
>> On Apr 29, 2011, at 5:55, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Cc'd input, and analog devices driver list...
>>>
>>> On 04/28/11 19:17, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I am having trouble getting the ad714x (i2c) driver to work in my
>>>> test setup. I am using the VGA i2c bus to talk to the ad7147 I have.
>>>> I used INTA of a PCI ethernet slot in my PC. I enabled the PCI device
>>>> without the driver module loaded. I then give the interrupt number
>>>> to ad714x through the struct i2c_board_info. I actually tried the
>>>> same setup on two PCs, one intel graphics, the other nvidia to
>>>> eliminate the i2c master as a possible cause of my problem.
>>>>
>>>> The device is successfully loaded and I can see the interrupts going.
>>>> The eventN device created under /dev/input never spit out anything
>>>> and so I added printks in the threaded ISR handler to see what is
>>>> going on.
>>>>
>>>> I only have a wheel with 8 stages. In ad714x_wheel_state_machine() I
>>>> see that upon the first interrupt, the state goes from IDLE to
>>>> JITTER. After this the JITTER case checks that c_state == mask (with
>>>> mask being 0xff in our case). This condition is never met and the
>>>> driver stays indefinitely in this state. After lifting my finger from
>>>> the wheel, the chip settles down to scanning every so many
>>>> milliseconds.
>>>>
>>>> The STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS is always 0 when my finger is off, but
>>>> varies a lot while my finger is on (while interrupt frequency is
>>>> high). Looking at the value of STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS in binary
>>>> reveals that the set bits are always in groups, e.g. 0x0007 or 0x001C
>>>> or 0x0081(I imagine a roll-over of our start_stage-end_stage (0-7)).
>>>> There seems to be a timing aspect here. I added a spin counter in the
>>>> threaded ISR to delay reading the 3 registers and that seemed to make
>>>> the c_state change a little.
>>>>
>>>> I modified the code that reads the 3 registers right after the
>>>> mutex_lock in ad714x_interrupt_thread so that the
>>>> STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS is read before the other two (LOW and HIGH
>>>> regs). The result was surprising. The COMPLETE reg did read 0xff now
>>>> and the JITTER case went past the "if(c_state == mask)" but later
>>>> crashed (divide by 0) in ad714x_wheel_cal_abs_pos() called from the
>>>> JITTER case.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here's the initial configuration I give the driver:
>>>>
>>>> static struct ad714x_wheel_plat wheel_platform_data = {
>>>> .start_stage = 0, // int start_stage;
>>>> .end_stage = 7, // int end_stage;
>>>> .max_coord = 128, // int max_coord;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> static struct ad714x_platform_data wheel_dev_platform_data = {
>>>> .slider_num = 0,
>>>> .wheel_num = 1,
>>>> .touchpad_num = 0,
>>>> .button_num = 0,
>>>> .slider = 0,
>>>> .wheel = &wheel_platform_data, // struct ad714x_wheel_plat *wheel;
>>>> .touchpad = 0, // struct ad714x_touchpad_plat *touchpad;
>>>> .button = 0, // struct ad714x_button_plat *button;
>>>> .stage_cfg_reg = { /* unsigned short stage_cfg_reg[STAGE_NUM][STAGE_CFGREG_NUM] */
>>>> {0xfffe, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>> {0xfffb, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>> {0xffef, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>> {0xffbf, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>> {0xfeff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>> {0xfbff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>> {0xefff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>> {0xffff, 0x3ffe, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>>
>>>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>>>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>>>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>>>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>>>> },
>>>> .sys_cfg_reg = {0x027e, 0x00ff, 0x3233, 0x0819, 0x0832, 0x0000, 0x00ff, 0}, /* unsigned short sys_cfg_reg[SYS_CFGREG_NUM] */
>>>> //.sys_cfg_reg = {0x2b2, 0xfff, 0x3233, 0x819, 0x832, 0xcff, 0xcff, 0x0}, /* unsigned short sys_cfg_reg[SYS_CFGREG_NUM] */
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I also had to change the request_threaded_irq flags to specify
>>>> IRQF_ONESHOT so the kernel keeps the interrupt masked while we are
>>>> running ad714x_interrupt_thread(). Otherwise we were getting storms
>>>> of interrupts each time only one was requested. I am wondering if
>>>> this should be pulled back to the mainline kernel?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for pointers and clues!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> here's the printk I added to ad714x_wheel_state_machine()
>>
>> mask = ((1 << (hw->end_stage + 1)) - 1) - ((1 << hw->start_stage) - 1);
>>
>> h_state = ad714x->h_state & mask;
>> c_state = ad714x->c_state & mask;
>> dev_dbg(ad714x->dev, "interrupt state:%d mask:0x%x l:0x%x h:0x%x c:0x%x\n",
>> sw->state,
>> (u32)mask,
>> (u32)ad714x->l_state,
>> (u32)ad714x->h_state,
>> (u32)ad714x->c_state);
>>
>> Here what it looks like upon loading a module which does the i2c_new_device of the AD7147:
>>
>> <7>[58302.186886] my-pci-stub 0000:01:04.0: claimed by my platform module PCI stub
>> <6>[58302.186903] my-pci-stub 0000:01:04.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
>> <6>[58302.189815] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: found AD7147(A) captouch, rev:1
>> <6>[58302.427237] input: Unspecified device as /devices/virtual/input/input8
>>
>> [ pause here while my hand goes from my mouse and keyboard to the wheel on the AD7147 ]
>>
>> <7>[58311.646183] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:0 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x1c
>> <7>[58311.646192] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: case IDLE in if
>> <7>[58311.655436] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: wheel 0 touched
>> <7>[58311.663087] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x7
>> <7>[58311.674562] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.686803] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.699147] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.711430] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.723585] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.736017] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.748298] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.760581] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.772800] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.785176] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.797473] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.809651] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x10 c:0x81
>>
>> [ here I lift my finger ]
>>
>> <7>[58311.822059] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.834345] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.846582] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.858800] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.871212] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.883517] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.895802] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.908099] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.920381] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>> <7>[58311.932585] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> <7>[58313.432218] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>> <7>[58314.157343] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>
>> [... after 2 seconds or so, the rhythm slows down to 2 interrupts per second or so ]
>>
>> <7>[58314.169629] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x80
>>
>> <7>[58314.976518] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x80
>>
>> <7>[58315.783342] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x80
>>
>>
>> There is a clue in what I did next. I added a wait time in the isr thread function like so:
>>
>> static irqreturn_t ad714x_interrupt_thread(int irq, void *data)
>> {
>> struct ad714x_chip *ad714x = data;
>> volatile int i;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&ad714x->mutex);
>>
>> i=0xffffff;
>> while(i)
>> --i;
>>
>> ad714x->read(ad714x->dev, STG_LOW_INT_STA_REG, &ad714x->l_state);
>> ad714x->read(ad714x->dev, STG_HIGH_INT_STA_REG, &ad714x->h_state);
>> ad714x->read(ad714x->dev, STG_COM_INT_STA_REG, &ad714x->c_state);
>> [ ... ]
>>
>> this changes the above trace to these values:
>>
>> while touching the wheel:
>> <7>[63085.414268] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:0 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x60
>> <7>[63085.414277] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: case IDLE in if
>> <7>[63085.423519] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: wheel 0 touched
>> <7>[63085.578931] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x18
>> <7>[63085.736079] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x3
>> <7>[63085.832304] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x60
>> <7>[63086.938334] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x30 c:0x60
>> <7>[63087.030835] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
>> <7>[63087.122909] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
>> <7>[63087.215014] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
>> <7>[63087.307071] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
>> <7>[63087.399367] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
>> <7>[63087.739386] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x83
>>
>> Again, notice the state going from 0 (IDLE) to 1(JITTER), and never entering the "if" in the JITTER case (needs mask == c_state). The HIGH register varies a lot while I move my finger around, but the COMPLETE looks like its always going and being cleared. I mentioned before that reading the COMPLETE status reg before the LOW and HIGH produces completely different results.
>>
>> I am suspecting the register configuration we use is off somehow, I will review them thoroughly. Aside from this we are running out of leads here, anyone has input on this?
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>> JFD
>>
>>
> Hi Jean-Francois,
>
> Barry Song, the driver author left ADI quite some time ago
> I don't have hardware to test things at the moment.
>
> The EVAL-AD7147 only has sliders and buttons, so I don't know how useful
> it will be here.
> Need to check if I can find one having a wheel.
>
>
Hi Jean-Francois,
The ADZS-BFLLCD-EZEXT features a AD7147-1 + wheel.
I'll take a look and get back to you later this week.
--
Greetings,
Michael
--
Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Muenchen; Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 40368;
Geschaeftsfuehrer:Dr.Carsten Suckrow, Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin,
Margaret Seif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ad714x driver help and possible bug
2011-05-03 15:16 ` Michael Hennerich
@ 2011-05-03 23:50 ` Jean-François Dagenais
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jean-François Dagenais @ 2011-05-03 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: michael.hennerich
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Barry Song, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Lapointe, Yves, Flanagan, Adrian,
Pratt, Susan
On May 3, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Michael Hennerich wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 04:33 PM, Michael Hennerich wrote:
>> On 05/03/2011 04:13 PM, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 29, 2011, at 5:55, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Cc'd input, and analog devices driver list...
>>>>
>>>> On 04/28/11 19:17, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am having trouble getting the ad714x (i2c) driver to work in my
>>>>> test setup. I am using the VGA i2c bus to talk to the ad7147 I have.
>>>>> I used INTA of a PCI ethernet slot in my PC. I enabled the PCI device
>>>>> without the driver module loaded. I then give the interrupt number
>>>>> to ad714x through the struct i2c_board_info. I actually tried the
>>>>> same setup on two PCs, one intel graphics, the other nvidia to
>>>>> eliminate the i2c master as a possible cause of my problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> The device is successfully loaded and I can see the interrupts going.
>>>>> The eventN device created under /dev/input never spit out anything
>>>>> and so I added printks in the threaded ISR handler to see what is
>>>>> going on.
>>>>>
>>>>> I only have a wheel with 8 stages. In ad714x_wheel_state_machine() I
>>>>> see that upon the first interrupt, the state goes from IDLE to
>>>>> JITTER. After this the JITTER case checks that c_state == mask (with
>>>>> mask being 0xff in our case). This condition is never met and the
>>>>> driver stays indefinitely in this state. After lifting my finger from
>>>>> the wheel, the chip settles down to scanning every so many
>>>>> milliseconds.
>>>>>
>>>>> The STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS is always 0 when my finger is off, but
>>>>> varies a lot while my finger is on (while interrupt frequency is
>>>>> high). Looking at the value of STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS in binary
>>>>> reveals that the set bits are always in groups, e.g. 0x0007 or 0x001C
>>>>> or 0x0081(I imagine a roll-over of our start_stage-end_stage (0-7)).
>>>>> There seems to be a timing aspect here. I added a spin counter in the
>>>>> threaded ISR to delay reading the 3 registers and that seemed to make
>>>>> the c_state change a little.
>>>>>
>>>>> I modified the code that reads the 3 registers right after the
>>>>> mutex_lock in ad714x_interrupt_thread so that the
>>>>> STAGE_COMPLETE_INT_STATUS is read before the other two (LOW and HIGH
>>>>> regs). The result was surprising. The COMPLETE reg did read 0xff now
>>>>> and the JITTER case went past the "if(c_state == mask)" but later
>>>>> crashed (divide by 0) in ad714x_wheel_cal_abs_pos() called from the
>>>>> JITTER case.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's the initial configuration I give the driver:
>>>>>
>>>>> static struct ad714x_wheel_plat wheel_platform_data = {
>>>>> .start_stage = 0, // int start_stage;
>>>>> .end_stage = 7, // int end_stage;
>>>>> .max_coord = 128, // int max_coord;
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> static struct ad714x_platform_data wheel_dev_platform_data = {
>>>>> .slider_num = 0,
>>>>> .wheel_num = 1,
>>>>> .touchpad_num = 0,
>>>>> .button_num = 0,
>>>>> .slider = 0,
>>>>> .wheel = &wheel_platform_data, // struct ad714x_wheel_plat *wheel;
>>>>> .touchpad = 0, // struct ad714x_touchpad_plat *touchpad;
>>>>> .button = 0, // struct ad714x_button_plat *button;
>>>>> .stage_cfg_reg = { /* unsigned short stage_cfg_reg[STAGE_NUM][STAGE_CFGREG_NUM] */
>>>>> {0xfffe, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>>> {0xfffb, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>>> {0xffef, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>>> {0xffbf, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>>> {0xfeff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>>> {0xfbff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>>> {0xefff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>>> {0xffff, 0x3ffe, 0, 0x2626, 0x3e8, 0x3e8, 0x1388, 0x1388 },
>>>>>
>>>>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>>>>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>>>>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>>>>> {0xffff, 0x3fff, 0, 0x0606, 0x01f4, 0x01f4, 0x0320, 0x0320},
>>>>> },
>>>>> .sys_cfg_reg = {0x027e, 0x00ff, 0x3233, 0x0819, 0x0832, 0x0000, 0x00ff, 0}, /* unsigned short sys_cfg_reg[SYS_CFGREG_NUM] */
>>>>> //.sys_cfg_reg = {0x2b2, 0xfff, 0x3233, 0x819, 0x832, 0xcff, 0xcff, 0x0}, /* unsigned short sys_cfg_reg[SYS_CFGREG_NUM] */
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I also had to change the request_threaded_irq flags to specify
>>>>> IRQF_ONESHOT so the kernel keeps the interrupt masked while we are
>>>>> running ad714x_interrupt_thread(). Otherwise we were getting storms
>>>>> of interrupts each time only one was requested. I am wondering if
>>>>> this should be pulled back to the mainline kernel?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for pointers and clues!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> here's the printk I added to ad714x_wheel_state_machine()
>>>
>>> mask = ((1 << (hw->end_stage + 1)) - 1) - ((1 << hw->start_stage) - 1);
>>>
>>> h_state = ad714x->h_state & mask;
>>> c_state = ad714x->c_state & mask;
>>> dev_dbg(ad714x->dev, "interrupt state:%d mask:0x%x l:0x%x h:0x%x c:0x%x\n",
>>> sw->state,
>>> (u32)mask,
>>> (u32)ad714x->l_state,
>>> (u32)ad714x->h_state,
>>> (u32)ad714x->c_state);
>>>
>>> Here what it looks like upon loading a module which does the i2c_new_device of the AD7147:
>>>
>>> <7>[58302.186886] my-pci-stub 0000:01:04.0: claimed by my platform module PCI stub
>>> <6>[58302.186903] my-pci-stub 0000:01:04.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
>>> <6>[58302.189815] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: found AD7147(A) captouch, rev:1
>>> <6>[58302.427237] input: Unspecified device as /devices/virtual/input/input8
>>>
>>> [ pause here while my hand goes from my mouse and keyboard to the wheel on the AD7147 ]
>>>
>>> <7>[58311.646183] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:0 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x1c
>>> <7>[58311.646192] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: case IDLE in if
>>> <7>[58311.655436] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: wheel 0 touched
>>> <7>[58311.663087] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x7
>>> <7>[58311.674562] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.686803] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.699147] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.711430] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.723585] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x18 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.736017] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.748298] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.760581] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.772800] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.785176] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.797473] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.809651] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x10 c:0x81
>>>
>>> [ here I lift my finger ]
>>>
>>> <7>[58311.822059] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.834345] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.846582] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.858800] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.871212] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.883517] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.895802] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.908099] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.920381] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58311.932585] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> <7>[58313.432218] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>> <7>[58314.157343] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x81
>>>
>>> [... after 2 seconds or so, the rhythm slows down to 2 interrupts per second or so ]
>>>
>>> <7>[58314.169629] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x80
>>>
>>> <7>[58314.976518] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x80
>>>
>>> <7>[58315.783342] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x0 c:0x80
>>>
>>>
>>> There is a clue in what I did next. I added a wait time in the isr thread function like so:
>>>
>>> static irqreturn_t ad714x_interrupt_thread(int irq, void *data)
>>> {
>>> struct ad714x_chip *ad714x = data;
>>> volatile int i;
>>>
>>> mutex_lock(&ad714x->mutex);
>>>
>>> i=0xffffff;
>>> while(i)
>>> --i;
>>>
>>> ad714x->read(ad714x->dev, STG_LOW_INT_STA_REG, &ad714x->l_state);
>>> ad714x->read(ad714x->dev, STG_HIGH_INT_STA_REG, &ad714x->h_state);
>>> ad714x->read(ad714x->dev, STG_COM_INT_STA_REG, &ad714x->c_state);
>>> [ ... ]
>>>
>>> this changes the above trace to these values:
>>>
>>> while touching the wheel:
>>> <7>[63085.414268] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:0 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x60
>>> <7>[63085.414277] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: case IDLE in if
>>> <7>[63085.423519] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: wheel 0 touched
>>> <7>[63085.578931] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x18
>>> <7>[63085.736079] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x3
>>> <7>[63085.832304] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x70 c:0x60
>>> <7>[63086.938334] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x30 c:0x60
>>> <7>[63087.030835] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
>>> <7>[63087.122909] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
>>> <7>[63087.215014] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
>>> <7>[63087.307071] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
>>> <7>[63087.399367] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x60
>>> <7>[63087.739386] ad714x_captouch 9-002c: interrupt state:1 mask:0xff l:0x0 h:0x38 c:0x83
>>>
>>> Again, notice the state going from 0 (IDLE) to 1(JITTER), and never entering the "if" in the JITTER case (needs mask == c_state). The HIGH register varies a lot while I move my finger around, but the COMPLETE looks like its always going and being cleared. I mentioned before that reading the COMPLETE status reg before the LOW and HIGH produces completely different results.
>>>
>>> I am suspecting the register configuration we use is off somehow, I will review them thoroughly. Aside from this we are running out of leads here, anyone has input on this?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance!
>>> JFD
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Jean-Francois,
>>
>> Barry Song, the driver author left ADI quite some time ago
>> I don't have hardware to test things at the moment.
>>
>> The EVAL-AD7147 only has sliders and buttons, so I don't know how useful
>> it will be here.
>> Need to check if I can find one having a wheel.
>>
>>
> Hi Jean-Francois,
>
> The ADZS-BFLLCD-EZEXT features a AD7147-1 + wheel.
> I'll take a look and get back to you later this week.
>
Hi again Michael,
I forgot to mention something that may be useful. We wired the 8 stages exactly like the wheel example of figure 26, page 15, of the AD7147 datasheet (Rev B, 07/2009). The register configuration I pasted above in the init structures should match this.
Thanks again for your support.
> --
> Greetings,
> Michael
>
> --
> Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Muenchen; Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 40368;
> Geschaeftsfuehrer:Dr.Carsten Suckrow, Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin,
> Margaret Seif
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-03 23:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <62821D7C-1637-4F7E-A53A-F52AEB2A6C87@gmail.com>
2011-04-29 9:55 ` ad714x driver help and possible bug Jonathan Cameron
[not found] ` <4DBAD0AC.3010608@analog.com>
2011-04-29 14:58 ` Michael Hennerich
2011-05-02 20:43 ` Jean-Francois Dagenais
2011-05-03 14:13 ` Jean-Francois Dagenais
[not found] ` <A89A87E2-E4C4-4DD7-9E51-9FD38D93DC0E@gmail.com>
2011-05-03 14:33 ` Michael Hennerich
2011-05-03 15:16 ` Michael Hennerich
2011-05-03 23:50 ` Jean-François Dagenais
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).