From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] power_supply: add power supply scope Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 08:58:09 -0800 Message-ID: <4EE23E21.7090509@goop.org> References: <4EDE4C7A.1010802@goop.org> <4EDFA192.7000602@goop.org> <4EE015D1.5070005@goop.org> <20111208104127.GA1753@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <4EE0EB7B.6060807@goop.org> <20111208233643.GA19022@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <4EE1C467.9050607@goop.org> <20111209095925.GA19883@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:35226 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750954Ab1LITjb (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:39:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111209095925.GA19883@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Anton Vorontsov Cc: David Woodhouse , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Richard Hughes , Daniel Nicoletti , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina , vojtech@ucw.cz, Przemo Firszt , Richard Hughes On 12/09/2011 01:59 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:18:47AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> On 12/08/2011 03:36 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: >>> No different at all, I'm fine with either power_supply.scope or any >>> other flag. :-) >> So are you happy to pull that branch, or did you have some other >> concerns with it? > I'm OK w/ the idea itself, but to actually pull that branch, the issue > w/ needless patching of battery drivers has to be fixed (i.e. drop the > changes in the drivers/acpi/). OK, and just use the default System? So only patch devices which are actually self-powered? J