From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Heiny Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/11] input: RMI4 core bus and sensor drivers. Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:49:38 -0800 Message-ID: <4F060CE2.5090705@synaptics.com> References: <1324519802-23894-1-git-send-email-cheiny@synaptics.com> <1324519802-23894-3-git-send-email-cheiny@synaptics.com> <4F0150D7.2010600@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from us-mx3.synaptics.com ([12.239.217.85]:28118 "EHLO us-mx3.synaptics.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754234Ab2AEUti (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:49:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F0150D7.2010600@ti.com> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Shubhrajyoti Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Jean Delvare , Linux Kernel , Linux Input , Joerie de Gram , Linus Walleij , Naveen Kumar Gaddipati On 01/01/2012 10:38 PM, Shubhrajyoti wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > On Thursday 22 December 2011 07:39 AM, Christopher Heiny wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Christopher Heiny >> [snip] >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM >> +static int rmi_bus_suspend(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> +#ifdef GENERIC_SUBSYS_PM_OPS >> + const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL; >> + >> + if (pm&& pm->suspend) >> + return pm->suspend(dev); > If driver-pm- suspend is not there should you not fall back to . suspend ? You're thinking of dev->driver->suspend here, right? If so, that sounds good to me. > >> +#endif >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int rmi_bus_resume(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> +#ifdef GENERIC_SUBSYS_PM_OPS >> + const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL; >> + >> + if (pm&& pm->resume) >> + return pm->resume(dev); > same here? >> +#endif >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> +#endif