From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: am335x: TSC & ADC reworking including DT pieces, take 4 Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:18:57 +0200 Message-ID: <51B74DF1.3010502@linutronix.de> References: <1370950268-7224-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20130611142358.GG29135@zurbaran> <51B74252.5090906@linutronix.de> <20130611161054.GJ29135@zurbaran> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:36707 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751903Ab3FKQTF (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:19:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130611161054.GJ29135@zurbaran> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Samuel Ortiz Cc: Lee Jones , =?UTF-8?B?QmVub8OudCBDb3Vzc29u?= , Tony Lindgren , Jonathan Cameron , Dmitry Torokhov , Felipe Balbi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org On 06/11/2013 06:10 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Samuel, > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 05:29:22PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior w= rote: >>> Then, this is a pretty big patchset, with iio, input and mfd all mi= xed >>> together and it is likely to create merge conflicts. >> They somehow depend on each other. Otherwise I would have sent three >> series, one per subsystem. > Of course they depend on each other, but the dependency is mostly for > iio and input to depend on the MFD changes. Except for the one #18 as mentioned below. >> Still. There is #18 which reworks the "step addressing" and involves >> changes in both (iio & input) at the same time. > Would splitting iio and input break anything there ? Yes. Once the header files is modified without the two .c files the driver is not working. To fix this I need another patch making sure input + iio does not the header files and another to user it (once everything is merged). >> There is #21. Adding this to the initial "DT support" patch would be= bad >> I think because it requires some changes on the iio side which have >> nothing to do with DT. Putting the iio changes before DT would requi= re >> to make some change to platform-data part which will go away anyway. > Wouldn't it workif you split this one into an MFD+dts file changes an= d > another one for the iio changes ? It would work in general. The first few DT-iio patches wouldn't make sense but then why not. >> So I started collecting ACKs from input and iio to avoid this split.= If >> you really want the split then I will start doing so=E2=80=A6 > I think it would be nicer, yes. Nicer. I see. Please tell me what you think about #1 because I really would like to drop regmap and then I can start reshuffle the series :) >=20 > Cheers, > Samuel. >=20 Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html