From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Srinivas Pandruvada Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] hid-sensor-hub: move to devm_kzalloc Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:31:08 -0700 Message-ID: <52123A3C.6010404@linux.intel.com> References: <1376467631-20857-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1376467631-20857-3-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:18101 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750740Ab3HSPYA (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:24:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1376467631-20857-3-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Jiri Kosina , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Srinivas Pandruvada On 08/14/2013 01:07 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > devm_kzalloc() will manage resources freeing and allows to make error path > smaller and nicer. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > --- > drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c | 17 +++++------------ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c > index d0687d0..4cb19df 100644 > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c > @@ -477,16 +477,15 @@ static int sensor_hub_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, > struct hid_field *field; > int dev_cnt; > > - sd = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sensor_hub_data), GFP_KERNEL); > + sd = devm_kzalloc(&hdev->dev, sizeof(*sd), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!sd) { > hid_err(hdev, "cannot allocate Sensor data\n"); > return -ENOMEM; > } > - sd->hsdev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct hid_sensor_hub_device), GFP_KERNEL); > + sd->hsdev = devm_kzalloc(&hdev->dev, sizeof(*sd->hsdev), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!sd->hsdev) { > hid_err(hdev, "cannot allocate hid_sensor_hub_device\n"); > - ret = -ENOMEM; > - goto err_free_hub; > + return -ENOMEM; > } > hid_set_drvdata(hdev, sd); > sd->hsdev->hdev = hdev; > @@ -498,14 +497,14 @@ static int sensor_hub_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, > ret = hid_parse(hdev); > if (ret) { > hid_err(hdev, "parse failed\n"); > - goto err_free; > + return ret; > } > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hdev->inputs); > > ret = hid_hw_start(hdev, 0); > if (ret) { > hid_err(hdev, "hw start failed\n"); > - goto err_free; > + return ret; > } > ret = hid_hw_open(hdev); > if (ret) { > @@ -570,10 +569,6 @@ err_close: > hid_hw_close(hdev); > err_stop_hw: > hid_hw_stop(hdev); > -err_free: > - kfree(sd->hsdev); > -err_free_hub: > - kfree(sd); > > return ret; > } > @@ -597,8 +592,6 @@ static void sensor_hub_remove(struct hid_device *hdev) > kfree(data->hid_sensor_hub_client_devs); > hid_set_drvdata(hdev, NULL); > mutex_destroy(&data->mutex); > - kfree(data->hsdev); > - kfree(data); > } > > static const struct hid_device_id sensor_hub_devices[] = { Agreed. Thanks, Srinivas