From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Echtler Subject: Behaviour of input-polldev? Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:39:17 +0200 Message-ID: <5225CA65.7030104@butterbrot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3GQ0qINcP1eNh4piK8kVhRn0Ikv9WPEJN" Return-path: Received: from butterbrot.org ([176.9.106.16]:33969 "EHLO butterbrot.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932597Ab3ICLrQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 07:47:16 -0400 Received: from [192.168.178.30] (ppp-188-174-14-6.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.14.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by butterbrot.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B44BDC00214 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:39:18 +0200 (CEST) Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: linux-input This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --3GQ0qINcP1eNh4piK8kVhRn0Ikv9WPEJN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone, I'm in the process of writing an input driver for the Microsoft Pixelsense (formerly Surface 2.0). The device only has bulk endpoints and consequently needs to be polled regularly. My beta driver uses input-polldev for this, and it appears to work nicely, however, I couldn't find out how input-polldev behaves if one polling cycle takes longer than expected and a new poll would already be triggered while the first one is still running? Thanks & BR, Florian --=20 SENT FROM MY DEC VT50 TERMINAL --3GQ0qINcP1eNh4piK8kVhRn0Ikv9WPEJN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlIlymUACgkQ7CzyshGvath5RwCg2gTC9e3TAfX/6d8QNANecTtr 3yoAoOKz0R2bSJzl7laTZ9pxeueRxPtc =wYIA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3GQ0qINcP1eNh4piK8kVhRn0Ikv9WPEJN--