From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dyer Subject: Re: Atmel updates to atmel_mxt_ts touch controller driver - v6 Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:01:51 +0000 Message-ID: <52D98C2F.60001@itdev.co.uk> References: <1372337366-9286-1-git-send-email-nick.dyer@itdev.co.uk> <20130718194739.GA559@polaris.bitmath.org> <520CFA0D.4090905@itdev.co.uk> <20130815160734.GB12196@core.coreip.homeip.net> <522F2590.1080103@itdev.co.uk> <52D66699.8020309@itdev.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from kdh-gw.itdev.co.uk ([89.21.227.133]:18366 "EHLO hermes.kdh.itdev.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752942AbaAQUCA (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:02:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Yufeng Shen Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Henrik Rydberg , Daniel Kurtz , Joonyoung Shim , Alan Bowens , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Meerwald , Benson Leung , Olof Johansson , adlr@chromium.org Yufeng Shen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Nick Dyer > wrote: > > We (Chromium authors) are planning on bringing our local tree of atmel > > driver to be as close as possible to > > upstream and trying to figure out what's the best tree to rebase against. > > I was considering picking up the patches that Dimitry has already reviewed > and rebasing them against the current mainline to try and get things moving > again - would that be useful? > > That would certainly be useful. Please let me know the branch/tag name once > you finish that. I've rebased Dimitry's atmel-mxt-ts branch against his dtor/next tree. You can find it at https://github.com/ndyer/linux/tree/for-next-20140117-dtor-rebase I needed to update the INIT_COMPLETION api. So far I have verified it builds, will do some testing on it next week. I will also need to port my previous patchset on top of this branch.