From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/7] mfd: AXP20x: Add support for AXP202 and AXP209 Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 20:29:11 +0100 Message-ID: <53123507.6020607@redhat.com> References: <1393692352-10839-1-git-send-email-carlo@caione.org> <53121151.9050804@redhat.com> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, emilio-0Z03zUJReD5OxF6Tv1QG9Q@public.gmane.org, wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org, sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org, lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 03/01/2014 06:17 PM, Carlo Caione wrote: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi Carlo, >> >> Great work, thanks for all the time you're putting into this! > > Hi Hans :) > >> I've 2 questions: >> >> 1) What dependencies does this patch-set have? Obviously it needs the NMI irq >> patches for A20, anything else ? I no longer see any use of a special flag >> for ack on unmask, is that no longer needed ? > > Yes, the only dependency is on the NMI controller patch. > After a discussion with Maxime and Thomas I decided to not push for > including the special flag for ack on unmask in the irqchip core but > to use the unmask callback as in the v3 version of the NMI controller > driver (so no flag needed) > >> 2) No poweroff functionality ? That would be really great to have. > > Actually in [PATCH 1/7] I support the poweroff using the pm_power_off hook. Ah I missed that, cool. I'm doing with sunxi hacking for today, but I'll add these to sunxi-devel and them give them a test run tomorrow. Regards, Hans