From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/7] mfd: AXP20x: Add support for AXP202 and AXP209 Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:05:50 +0100 Message-ID: <5318568E.4040405@redhat.com> References: <1393692352-10839-1-git-send-email-carlo@caione.org> <53121151.9050804@redhat.com> <53123507.6020607@redhat.com> <531782DF.6090209@redhat.com> <531848E5.4050704@redhat.com> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Maxime Ripard , emilio-0Z03zUJReD5OxF6Tv1QG9Q@public.gmane.org, wens Tsai , sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org, Lee Jones , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Liam Girdwood , broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 03/06/2014 11:10 AM, Carlo Caione wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 03/05/2014 09:46 PM, Carlo Caione wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>>> >>>> So I've added your patches to my sunxi-devel tree and they work as advertised :) >>> >>> Thank you for keeping the tree updated :) >>> >>>> I've also added dt support for the axp209 to the cubietruck dts file, to avoid >>>> things becoming a copy and paste fest I've introduced a new axp209.dtsi file, >>>> as well as did some fixes to the existing sun?i-a*.dtsi files, see my tree here: >>>> https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commits/sunxi-devel >>> >>> That was also my idea (creating a new axp20x.dtsi) but it has been >>> turned down by Maxime and Lee >> >> Hmm, do you have a pointer to the mailinglist discussion about this ? > > Sure, http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg306497.html Ah, yes but that is before you added all the regulators, which are a fixed part of the chip. Once you get long dts bits like that having a dtsi file makes a lot of sense IMHO. Note that the part of the dts this was discussing is actually the part I did not put in the dtis, since it can vary per board :) Regards, Hans