From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
"sachin.kamat@linaro.org" <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>,
"linux-input@vger.kernel.org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch]GPIO button is supposed to wake the system up if the wakeup attribute is set
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:48:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53500CEB.9060405@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53500470.8090009@linux.intel.com>
On Thursday 17 April 2014 10:12 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/4/16 20:35, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> On Tuesday 15 April 2014 09:48 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>>> On 2014/4/15 20:38, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>>> On Monday 14 April 2014 09:12 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>>>>> ping...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2014/4/10 18:48, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>>>> I think when we say irq_wake_enable() then based on underlying HW, it
>>>> should not turn off the irq if it is require for the wakeup. I mean it
>>>> need to be handle in the hw specific callbacks to keep enabling the
>>>> wakeup irq on suspend also.
>>> I failed to see why this can't be generic to all of the GPIO buttons for
>>> suspend wakeup. Do you see any cases broken by this proposal?
>> My point here is that if underlying HW needs to have irq enabled for
>> wakup then it need to handle in centralized location i.e. the driver
>> which is implementing it for the irq callbacks.
>> Otherwise, we need to change this on multiple places who needs wakeups
>> which is vast in nature like sd driver for sdcard insert/remove etc.
>> almost all drivers which need wakeups through GPIOs.
> I think we have to handle this driver by driver. I didn't see how can we
> make it in a centralized location. Looking forward to see your proposal.
For Tegra SoC, we have implemented this such that we keep re-enabe
interrupts when going to suspend. That's why my point is.
May be your SoC ha implemented on different way and hence it is require
NO_SUSPEND.
I do not have any negative remark here, I jut kept my point here.
> This is expected behavior. I think I still need IRQF_NO_SUSPEND here.
> What I want is, this IRQ is able to generate pm wakeup event to wake the
> system up. It's enough for my case.
>
> Did you see a failing case of my patch?
Nop, I have not tested the patch and I think it will not break anything
for me with your patch.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-17 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-10 2:11 [patch]GPIO button is supposed to wake the system up if the wakeup attribute is set Li, Aubrey
2014-04-10 10:48 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-04-14 15:42 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-04-15 12:38 ` Laxman Dewangan
2014-04-15 16:18 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-04-16 12:35 ` Laxman Dewangan
2014-04-17 16:42 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-04-17 17:18 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2014-04-17 17:48 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-04-17 23:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-04-18 5:23 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-04-20 19:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-04-21 1:34 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-04-21 15:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-04-21 16:16 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-04-21 16:26 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53500CEB.9060405@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sachin.kamat@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).