From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dyer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - Add support for T100 multi-touch Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:06:52 +0000 Message-ID: <549155BC.4080803@itdev.co.uk> References: <1418639947-28765-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <54905AD7.4070205@itdev.co.uk> <54905F00.4020107@collabora.co.uk> <54906031.8020309@itdev.co.uk> <54906285.3060907@collabora.co.uk> <549066D4.7000302@itdev.co.uk> <54906FEB.7060702@collabora.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from kdh-gw.itdev.co.uk ([89.21.227.133]:26703 "EHLO hermes.kdh.itdev.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751915AbaLQKGz (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:06:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54906FEB.7060702@collabora.co.uk> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Henrik Rydberg , Sjoerd Simons , Doug Anderson , Olof Johansson , Yufeng Shen , Benson Leung , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 16/12/14 17:46, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 12/16/2014 06:07 PM, Nick Dyer wrote: >> I had been keeping them separate on the basis that we don't want changes to >> support new T100 features to cause regressions in the old T9 handling. But >> there is a fair amount of duplication as you say, probably worth addressing. > > Yeah but if there are regressions I think we should address those instead of > duplicating code, to make the driver more maintainable in the long term. True enough. We will have to be careful to test on both types of device.