From: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@bitmath.org>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update rydberg's addresses
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 23:26:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BED60C.3030303@bitmath.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN+gG=Gmgk+wKSnHkSAERoWt+1PqAojNSZt6jo=qmzPOqJs+3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Benjamin,
> Henrik, I just used the get_maintainer to add you on CC to an input-mt
> patch series, and it ended up using the @euromail.se instead of your
> still valid one. I can resend to you the patch series if you want.
Thanks, that won't be necessary.
I looked through the the patchset, and it strikes me as mostly renames without
deeper explanations, which all in all puts them in the not-needed category, I am
afraid. An in-depth explanation could be added as a text block somewhere without
touching the current code.
The only patch that does something is the last one, and what it does could
easily be performed in userland, by further processing of the contacts there. I
therefore see no use for any of those patches in the kernel.
Is there a good reason for the first reaction to be to add special tweaks such
as this one in the kernel, rather than in a dedicated userland input system? I
am genuinely curious.
Thanks,
Henrik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-20 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-19 9:06 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update rydberg's addresses Henrik Rydberg
2015-01-19 21:08 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2015-01-20 0:13 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-01-20 0:34 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2015-01-20 22:26 ` Henrik Rydberg [this message]
2015-01-21 4:35 ` Peter Hutterer
2015-01-21 15:25 ` Henrik Rydberg
2015-01-21 16:23 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2015-01-21 19:38 ` Henrik Rydberg
2015-01-22 4:21 ` Fixing touch point jumps in the kernel (was Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update rydberg's addresses) Peter Hutterer
2015-01-22 8:00 ` Henrik Rydberg
2015-02-15 12:19 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update rydberg's addresses Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54BED60C.3030303@bitmath.org \
--to=rydberg@bitmath.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).