From: Andrew Duggan <aduggan@synaptics.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Christopher Heiny <cheiny@synaptics.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] input: rmi4: Regulator supply support
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 16:55:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <573A5E07.4010500@synaptics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160513222948.GD1256@tuxbot>
On 05/13/2016 03:29 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 12 May 17:52 PDT 2016, Andrew Duggan wrote:
>
>> On 05/11/2016 08:05 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Wed 11 May 16:30 PDT 2016, Andrew Duggan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Bjorn,
>>>>
>>>> On 05/10/2016 08:49 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> [..]
>>>>> So either we duplicate the regulator support in spi/i2c or we make them
>>>>> optional in the core driver. Sounds like you prefer the prior, i.e. v1
>>>>> of my patch.
>>>> Yes, after all this I think it makes sense to put regulator support in the
>>>> spi/i2c transports like in your v1 patch. I essentially duplicated the irq
>>>> handling code in both transports so I would be ok with duplicating regulator
>>>> support too. It doesn't seem like that much code. But, if this is too much
>>>> duplication we could create some sort of common file and put the common irq
>>>> and regulator support functions which could be called in the transports.
>>>> Similar to how rmi_2d_sensor.c defines some common functions shared between
>>>> rmi_f11 and rmi_f12.
>>>>
>>> Sounds reasonable, I'm okay with this. Did you have any comments on the
>>> implementation I had in v1?
>> I tested on a device which has an always on regulators so I didn't add
>> anything to device tree for the device. But, it returned 0 when it didn't
>> find anything which seems to be the correct behavior. Is there an easy way
>> to avoid sleeping for 10ms when there are no regulators? Maybe check if both
>> the supplies .consumer pointer is null?
>>
> I did look at this as well, but unfortunately the regulators does not
> come back as NULL, but rather as dummy regulators.
>
> The delay matches Tpowerup (iirc) from the data sheet, which I assume is
> firmware/hardware dependant. Should we provide a knob for that and
> default the sleep to 0ms?
Making the default 0 and then setting an appropriate time out for
devices which need it sounds like a good idea to me.
Thanks,
Andrew
> Regards,
> Bjorn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-16 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-30 16:57 [PATCH] Input: synaptics-rmi4: Support regulator supplies Bjorn Andersson
[not found] ` <1459357049-5608-1-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-31 18:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-03-31 19:14 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-04-01 1:47 ` Andrew Duggan
2016-04-21 22:37 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-05 20:55 ` Andrew Duggan
[not found] ` <572BB344.6030100-Gq53QDLGkWKakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-06 0:58 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-07 4:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] input: rmi4: Regulator supply support Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-07 4:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] input: rmi4: Move IRQ handling to rmi_driver Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-07 4:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] input: rmi4: Acquire and enable VDD and VIO supplies Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-09 19:58 ` Rob Herring
2016-05-07 4:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] input: rmi4: Remove set_page() call before core is initialized Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-10 0:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] input: rmi4: Regulator supply support Andrew Duggan
[not found] ` <57312CFB.2040304-Gq53QDLGkWKakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-10 15:49 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-11 23:30 ` Andrew Duggan
2016-05-12 3:05 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-13 0:52 ` Andrew Duggan
2016-05-13 22:29 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-16 23:55 ` Andrew Duggan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=573A5E07.4010500@synaptics.com \
--to=aduggan@synaptics.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=cheiny@synaptics.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).