From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: i2c-hid: Silently fail probe for CHPN0001 touchscreen Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 11:42:03 +0200 Message-ID: <585b5f34-8b00-bf84-5b99-fa204a3e3e75@redhat.com> References: <20180403131634.13187-2-hdegoede@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sasha Levin , Jiri Kosina Cc: "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 06-04-18 22:05, Sasha Levin wrote: > Hi, > > [This is an automated email] > > This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined > to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 20.8863) > > The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16, v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126. > > v4.16: Build OK! > v4.15.15: Build OK! > v4.14.32: Build OK! > v4.9.92: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 94116f8126de ("ACPI: Switch to use generic guid_t in acpi_evaluate_dsm()") > > v4.4.126: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 94116f8126de ("ACPI: Switch to use generic guid_t in acpi_evaluate_dsm()") Cool, first time I see this bot in action, nice work. > Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree. So FWIW this commit is NOT stable material (it cannot hurt, but it is not necessary). This commit really only makes sense together with a new touchscreen driver which does actually know how to handle the CHPN0001 touchscreen. For future mails like this, do I understand the mail correctly that if I do NOT want a patch picked up by the -stable helper bot to go to stable I do not have to do anything? Regards, Hans