* Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: i2c-hid: Silently fail probe for CHPN0001 touchscreen [not found] <20180403131634.13187-2-hdegoede@redhat.com> @ 2018-04-06 20:05 ` Sasha Levin 2018-04-07 9:42 ` Hans de Goede 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Sasha Levin @ 2018-04-06 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sasha Levin, Jiri Kosina Cc: Hans de Goede, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 20.8863) The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16, v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126. v4.16: Build OK! v4.15.15: Build OK! v4.14.32: Build OK! v4.9.92: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 94116f8126de ("ACPI: Switch to use generic guid_t in acpi_evaluate_dsm()") v4.4.126: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 94116f8126de ("ACPI: Switch to use generic guid_t in acpi_evaluate_dsm()") Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: i2c-hid: Silently fail probe for CHPN0001 touchscreen 2018-04-06 20:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] HID: i2c-hid: Silently fail probe for CHPN0001 touchscreen Sasha Levin @ 2018-04-07 9:42 ` Hans de Goede 2018-04-09 17:07 ` Sasha Levin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Hans de Goede @ 2018-04-07 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sasha Levin, Jiri Kosina Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 06-04-18 22:05, Sasha Levin wrote: > Hi, > > [This is an automated email] > > This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined > to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 20.8863) > > The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16, v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126. > > v4.16: Build OK! > v4.15.15: Build OK! > v4.14.32: Build OK! > v4.9.92: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 94116f8126de ("ACPI: Switch to use generic guid_t in acpi_evaluate_dsm()") > > v4.4.126: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 94116f8126de ("ACPI: Switch to use generic guid_t in acpi_evaluate_dsm()") Cool, first time I see this bot in action, nice work. > Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree. So FWIW this commit is NOT stable material (it cannot hurt, but it is not necessary). This commit really only makes sense together with a new touchscreen driver which does actually know how to handle the CHPN0001 touchscreen. For future mails like this, do I understand the mail correctly that if I do NOT want a patch picked up by the -stable helper bot to go to stable I do not have to do anything? Regards, Hans ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: i2c-hid: Silently fail probe for CHPN0001 touchscreen 2018-04-07 9:42 ` Hans de Goede @ 2018-04-09 17:07 ` Sasha Levin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Sasha Levin @ 2018-04-09 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hans de Goede Cc: Jiri Kosina, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >Hi, > >On 06-04-18 22:05, Sasha Levin wrote: >>Hi, >> >>[This is an automated email] >> >>This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined >>to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 20.8863) >> >>The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16, v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126. >> >>v4.16: Build OK! >>v4.15.15: Build OK! >>v4.14.32: Build OK! >>v4.9.92: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: >> 94116f8126de ("ACPI: Switch to use generic guid_t in acpi_evaluate_dsm()") >> >>v4.4.126: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: >> 94116f8126de ("ACPI: Switch to use generic guid_t in acpi_evaluate_dsm()") > >Cool, first time I see this bot in action, nice work. I'll leave it out, thanks! >>Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree. > >So FWIW this commit is NOT stable material (it cannot hurt, but it is not >necessary). This commit really only makes sense together with a new touchscreen >driver which does actually know how to handle the CHPN0001 touchscreen. > >For future mails like this, do I understand the mail correctly that if I >do NOT want a patch picked up by the -stable helper bot to go to stable >I do not have to do anything? I would probably try and pick it up without an ack. If possible, even a brief "no" reply if you don't want it in stable would be great. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-09 17:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20180403131634.13187-2-hdegoede@redhat.com>
2018-04-06 20:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] HID: i2c-hid: Silently fail probe for CHPN0001 touchscreen Sasha Levin
2018-04-07 9:42 ` Hans de Goede
2018-04-09 17:07 ` Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).