From: "Vincent Vanackere" <vincent.vanackere@gmail.com>
To: "Éric Piel" <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net>
Cc: Karl Pickett <karl.pickett@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:45:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65258a580704040145m6eb7108frfa8197d3b88e207a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <461357D8.8060608@tremplin-utc.net>
On 4/4/07, Éric Piel <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net> wrote:
> This default value is set to 300 ms. On my Xserver, the default value is
> 660 ms and by default in my distrib it's set to 500 ms. So, indeed, the
> default value of the ati_remote is quite small. Maybe you could increase
> FILTER_MAX to 10 (= 600 ms) in order to have something saner?
Well, this value was chosen because it matches what the hardware does
: as explained in the comments, the hardware generates exactly 5
events for the first keypress (spaced by ~50ms if I recall correctly).
At least on my hardware (=> Vendor=0bc7 ProdID=0004 Rev= 1.00), the
current default value match exactly what I'm expecting (never had the
problem : "if you do anything but barely tap the button you can get
multiple events reported").
Just a thought : perhaps some models are more sensitive than others
(and so the default should be made dependent on the exact remote
model)... what is your hardware id ?
Best regards,
Vincent
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-04 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-04 0:34 [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable Karl Pickett
2007-04-04 2:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-04-04 7:46 ` Éric Piel
2007-04-04 8:45 ` Vincent Vanackere [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65258a580704040145m6eb7108frfa8197d3b88e207a@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vincent.vanackere@gmail.com \
--cc=Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=karl.pickett@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).