From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
lee@kernel.org, daniel.thompson@linaro.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com,
deller@gmx.de
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] backlight: Match backlight device against struct fb_info.bl_dev
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:17:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bk8bjxzo.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240212162645.5661-2-tzimmermann@suse.de>
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> writes:
Hello Thomas,
> Framebuffer drivers for devices with dedicated backlight are supposed
> to set struct fb_info.bl_dev to the backlight's respective device. Use
> the value to match backlight and framebuffer in the backlight core code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c
> index 86e1cdc8e3697..48844a4f28ad3 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c
> @@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ static int fb_notifier_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
> {
> struct backlight_device *bd;
> struct fb_event *evdata = data;
> - int node = evdata->info->node;
> + struct fb_info *info = evdata->info;
> + int node = info->node;
> int fb_blank = 0;
>
> /* If we aren't interested in this event, skip it immediately ... */
> @@ -110,8 +111,12 @@ static int fb_notifier_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
>
> if (!bd->ops)
> goto out;
> - if (bd->ops->check_fb && !bd->ops->check_fb(bd, evdata->info))
> + else if (bd->ops->check_fb && !bd->ops->check_fb(bd, info))
> goto out;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT)
> + else if (info->bl_dev && info->bl_dev != bd)
If the driver doesn't provide a struct backlight_ops .check_fb callback, I
think that having an info->bl_dev should be mandatory ? Or at least maybe
there should be a warning if info->bl_dev isn't set ?
The would be a driver bug, right ?
Regardless, the change makes sense to me.
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-20 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-12 16:16 [PATCH 00/10] backlight: Replace struct fb_info in interfaces Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-12 16:16 ` [PATCH 01/10] backlight: Match backlight device against struct fb_info.bl_dev Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-15 12:02 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-02-20 9:17 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2024-02-20 9:37 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-20 9:46 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-02-12 16:16 ` [PATCH 02/10] auxdisplay/ht16k33: Remove struct backlight_ops.check_fb Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-13 13:17 ` Robin van der Gracht
2024-02-20 9:18 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-02-12 16:16 ` [PATCH 03/10] hid/hid-picolcd: Fix initialization order Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-20 9:19 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-02-12 16:16 ` [PATCH 04/10] hid/hid-picolcd: Remove struct backlight_ops.check_fb Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-13 14:53 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-13 21:57 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-15 12:06 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-02-15 12:19 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-20 9:24 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-02-12 16:16 ` [PATCH 05/10] backlight/aat2870-backlight: Remove struct backlight.check_fb Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-15 12:06 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-02-20 9:26 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-02-12 16:16 ` [PATCH 06/10] backlight/pwm-backlight: Remove struct backlight_ops.check_fb Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-12 17:25 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-02-15 12:08 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-02-20 9:27 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-02-12 16:16 ` [PATCH 07/10] fbdev/sh_mobile_lcdc_fb: " Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-20 9:27 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-02-12 16:16 ` [PATCH 08/10] fbdev/ssd1307fb: Init backlight before registering framebuffer Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-20 9:32 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-02-12 16:16 ` [PATCH 09/10] fbdev/ssd1307fb: Remove struct backlight_ops.check_fb Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-20 9:32 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-02-12 16:16 ` [PATCH 10/10] backlight: Add controls_device callback to struct backlight_ops Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-15 12:09 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-02-20 9:35 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-02-15 12:13 ` [PATCH 00/10] backlight: Replace struct fb_info in interfaces Daniel Thompson
2024-02-15 12:23 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-02-19 15:02 ` Lee Jones
2024-02-21 9:23 ` Thomas Zimmermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bk8bjxzo.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set \
--to=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).