From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: hid-sensor-accel-3d: Delete an error message for a failed memory
 allocation in hid_accel_3d_probe()
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 19:26:59 +0100
Message-ID: <9420fc82-1a37-3601-bafe-f57ef953bfcd@users.sourceforge.net>
References: <0406765c-bdd1-1a82-cf66-1c248063ae4f@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20180204112346.0977e938@archlinux>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:52118 "EHLO mout.web.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753972AbeBES11 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-input@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 5 Feb 2018 13:27:27 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20180204112346.0977e938@archlinux>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>, Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org

> If making changes like this I would suggest only sending one until
> you have have a response from the relevant maintainer.

The corresponding feedback can become more positive for such
a transformation pattern after a while, can't it?


> It would save you time as often these sorts of changes are
> a matter of personal taste and weighing up of costs vs gains
> - hence it is not obvious that they will be accepted.

Can the wording “WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message”
(from the script “checkpatch.pl”) be another incentive?

Regards,
Markus