From: "Tomasz Pakuła" <tomasz.pakula.oficjalny@gmail.com>
To: Baul Lee <baul.lee@xbow.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oleg Makarenko <oleg@makarenk.ooo>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: universal-pidff: stop the device when force-feedback init fails
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 22:41:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ce239858b358c60a243e34f2d61def2f986966a.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729142432.16184-1-baul.lee@xbow.com>
On Wed, 2026-07-29 at 23:24 +0900, Baul Lee wrote:
> universal_pidff_probe() starts the device with hid_hw_start() and then, if
> force-feedback initialisation fails, returns the error through a label that
> only does "return error". The device is left started.
>
> The HID core does not unwind on the driver's behalf. __hid_device_probe()
> releases the devres group, closes the report and clears hdev->driver:
>
> if (ret) {
> devres_release_group(&hdev->dev, hdev->devres_group_id);
> hid_close_report(hdev);
> hdev->driver = NULL;
> }
>
> The hidraw character device that hid_hw_start() registered through
> hid_connect() is allocated with kzalloc() and added with cdev_device_add(),
> so it is not devres-managed and survives that. With hdev->driver NULL,
> hid_device_remove() skips hid_hw_stop() as well, because it only unwinds
> while a driver is still attached. The registration therefore outlives the
> device on both paths.
>
> Opening the surviving /dev/hidrawX writes into freed memory. KASAN reports
> a use-after-free write from hidraw_open() -> hid_hw_open() -> the
> transport's open callback, which takes a spinlock inside the freed object.
> A descriptor that carries a PID usage page and no input reports is enough:
> hidraw claims the device so hid_hw_start() succeeds, while hid->inputs
> stays empty so force-feedback init fails. The other failure returns in
> hid_pidff_init_with_quirks() - no output reports, an allocation failure,
> pidff_init_fields(), pidff_check_autocenter(), an unusable effect count,
> input_ff_create() - all reach the same label.
>
> Stop the device on that path. hid-dr.c and hid-emsff.c, which start the
> device with the same HID_CONNECT_DEFAULT & ~HID_CONNECT_FF mask, already do
> this. The two earlier gotos must keep returning without hid_hw_stop(),
> since neither has a started device, so give the path that fails after the
> start its own label.
>
> Discovered by XBOW, triaged by Baul Lee <baul.lee@xbow.com>
>
> Fixes: f06bf8d94fff ("HID: Add hid-universal-pidff driver and supported device ids")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Baul Lee <baul.lee@xbow.com>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-universal-pidff.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-universal-pidff.c b/drivers/hid/hid-universal-pidff.c
> index 549dac555d40..60180467a0bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-universal-pidff.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-universal-pidff.c
> @@ -104,12 +104,14 @@ static int universal_pidff_probe(struct hid_device *hdev,
> error = init_function(hdev, id->driver_data);
> if (error) {
> hid_warn(hdev, "Error initialising force feedback\n");
> - goto err;
> + goto err_stop;
> }
>
> hid_info(hdev, "Universal pidff driver loaded successfully!");
>
> return 0;
> +err_stop:
> + hid_hw_stop(hdev);
> err:
> return error;
> }
Actually, now that I look at it, this isn't the only place where the
stop should happen. Any error after successful hid_hw_start() should
trigger hid_hw_stop().
So for this to truly matter, you should replace
return 0;
with
goto err_stop;
on lines 92 and 101. Just add error value clearing so error = 0 because
even though we're exiting there, it's not an error. Some devices just
show up as multiple separate HID devices.
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-02 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 14:24 [PATCH] HID: universal-pidff: stop the device when force-feedback init fails Baul Lee
2026-07-29 14:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 20:41 ` Tomasz Pakuła [this message]
2026-08-04 5:38 ` Baul Lee
2026-08-04 10:08 ` Tomasz Pakuła
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9ce239858b358c60a243e34f2d61def2f986966a.camel@gmail.com \
--to=tomasz.pakula.oficjalny@gmail.com \
--cc=baul.lee@xbow.com \
--cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@makarenk.ooo \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox