From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Smirl Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:52:11 -0500 Message-ID: <9e4733910912060952h4aad49dake8e8486acb6566bc@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091204220708.GD25669@core.coreip.homeip.net> <9e4733910912041628g5bedc9d2jbee3b0861aeb5511@mail.gmail.com> <1260070593.3236.6.camel@pc07.localdom.local> <20091206065512.GA14651@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4B1B99A5.2080903@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Krzysztof Halasa Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Dmitry Torokhov , hermann pitton , Christoph Bartelmus , awalls@radix.net, j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, jarod@wilsonet.com, kraxel@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, superm1@ubuntu.com List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Once again: how about agreement about the LIRC interface > (kernel-userspace) and merging the actual LIRC code first? In-kernel > decoding can wait a bit, it doesn't change any kernel-user interface. I'd like to see a semi-complete design for an in-kernel IR system before anything is merged from any source. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com