From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Tissoires Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/5] hid-multitouch: a first step towards multitouch unification Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:24:12 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1294425762-29730-1-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@enac.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:41463 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752622Ab1AJTYN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:24:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Stephane Chatty , Henrik Rydberg , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Jiri Kosina wrote: > >> > > I have now applied the patchset as-is to the 'multitouch' branch= in my >> > > tree. >> > >> > Which means -- could you please send any followup patches on top o= f that >> > branch (i.e. on top of the v3 patchset)? It would help my workflow= and >> > make the merging process smoother. >> >> 'multitouch' brach now builds, as Linus has taken Dmitry's pull requ= est >> and I have merged from Linus. >> >> So once you have fixed for the minor issues raised by Henrik and onc= e you >> have finished your testing, please send the additional fixes to me a= nd I >> will be merging the branch upstream. > > Hi Benjamin, > > we are now slowly aproaching the point in time in which I would like = to > prepare second round of HID tree merge with Linus. > > Have you finished your testing / fixing the minor issues raised by He= nrik > please? > > Thanks, > Hi Jiri, I'm still waiting for one tester (the generaltouch one). I hope he will be able to test it tomorrow (he told me he was busy unti= l today). I'm sure the driver works for two of the three devices (we have them at the lab). The generaltouch is less important as there is a conflict in the naming of the vendorID/deviceID: GeneralTouch sells two different devices with the same deviceID, and the older is handled by usbtouchscreen. St=E9phane explained to me today that people that want to use multitouc= h features will have to do some manipulations to enable it. I'll send the diff between v3-v4 tomorrow if you want or before if you really need. Cheers, Benjamin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html