Re: [PATCH v2] xpad: Overhaul device data for wireless devices

[Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>]

> On Apr 8, 2026, at 10:24 AM, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 05:47:06PM +0200, Antheas Kapenekakis wrote:
>>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 at 07:04, Sanjay Govind <sanjay.govind9@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 4:52 PM Dmitry Torokhov
>>> <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I think you'd have to spin up your own instance for that...
>>> 
>>> makes sense
>>> 
>> 
>> Hi Sanjay,
>> I have a workflow for running an llm and getting reviews locally.
>> Perhaps I will post it to the mailing list soon. I can cc you. I have
>> been out for the Easter holidays
>> 
>> Of course, you will need your own LLM and harness for that, Claude
>> code/Antigravity/Copilot/Opencode, etc. I know they aren't
>> particularly cheap.
>> 
>> Dmitry, sashiko looks great, I left a star. I could also cc you. I
>> will also reference the prompts used in that as it claims some
>> subsystem specific ones. From a quick glance it seems to might suffer
>> from context bloat though. There are a lot of guideline files that
>> could have higher information density.
> 
> I am just a happy user of sashiko, I'll leave it to Roman to comment on
> the potential bloat concerns.

All I can say is Sashiko is an open-source project and I’m happy to take
any pull requests (including alternative prompts) which are improving 
the quality of reviews. I’m not attached to any particular approach to the
prompting and happy to change it assuming there is data showing that
some other approach is better. 

Thanks!