From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-184.mta0.migadu.com (out-184.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.184]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23A323D8139 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 17:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.184 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775670376; cv=none; b=EhC7aEZjYHIqvibdu8rRn4+UZpD4i05MhW69TURfXZf/Boo8wMCKkcZLTaQzuGc3qdKSMls/xTWRBhIqsOh0GY063VBQ6+aWshQ43qzMNjdEwnF2Af66cEbkWAzqjdJiiR4BFyf/iwKTXBxykrufR0DC+G+1zwyFQ41QTdakfUU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775670376; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xjSuwusdQsmcBrGGY+DBB9PDuOHcfBhgyIuln9dU+HU=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Message-Id:References:To; b=A4BJxpM1PMOKB31dU/iO0KEHJqd1wMjohcznMkJa6yZ10O57JHLmEIRjljJ2gxOEWysJ7NjdVckM850UJ/218wbPwEmsB4Ib2T9m1nxb1wG2tDi0lv2ajfvVMIrLEiUu9SEqi9b6MkUFvus/bXBcs59pRZBqH7jVss55LiArXcI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=xb/pocGZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.184 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="xb/pocGZ" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1775670363; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xjSuwusdQsmcBrGGY+DBB9PDuOHcfBhgyIuln9dU+HU=; b=xb/pocGZPk4SVRy3HIpqyNlYIEQ7A9LMJodGungB9Bms+camjiBzRH2xE14dyHxnpA244m 6FGgg+QvO3YIn6znx3xBpfkzNtM4r70Q0tPwc0kgu7mm7E85UnN4p5iUlVU/XhTCcf42xh C9kdHXn+9My9J6zfo501KwJTq9uWB6E= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-input@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xpad: Overhaul device data for wireless devices X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Roman Gushchin In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 10:45:47 -0700 Cc: Antheas Kapenekakis , Sanjay Govind , Vicki Pfau , Nilton Perim Neto , Mario Limonciello , "Pierre-Loup A. Griffais" , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: References: To: Dmitry Torokhov X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT > On Apr 8, 2026, at 10:24=E2=80=AFAM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 05:47:06PM +0200, Antheas Kapenekakis wro= te: >>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 at 07:04, Sanjay Govind wr= ote: >>>=20 >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 4:52=E2=80=AFPM Dmitry Torokhov >>> wrote: >>>> I think you'd have to spin up your own instance for that... >>>=20 >>> makes sense >>>=20 >>=20 >> Hi Sanjay, >> I have a workflow for running an llm and getting reviews locally. >> Perhaps I will post it to the mailing list soon. I can cc you. I have >> been out for the Easter holidays >>=20 >> Of course, you will need your own LLM and harness for that, Claude >> code/Antigravity/Copilot/Opencode, etc. I know they aren't >> particularly cheap. >>=20 >> Dmitry, sashiko looks great, I left a star. I could also cc you. I >> will also reference the prompts used in that as it claims some >> subsystem specific ones. =46rom a quick glance it seems to might suffer >> from context bloat though. There are a lot of guideline files that >> could have higher information density. >=20 > I am just a happy user of sashiko, I'll leave it to Roman to comment on > the potential bloat concerns. All I can say is Sashiko is an open-source project and I=E2=80=99m happy to t= ake any pull requests (including alternative prompts) which are improving=20 the quality of reviews. I=E2=80=99m not attached to any particular approach t= o the prompting and happy to change it assuming there is data showing that some other approach is better.=20 Thanks!=