From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lirc@bartelmus.de (Christoph Bartelmus) Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? Date: 29 Nov 2009 20:49:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <9e4733910911291116r66dda6dap591d1b0f322f9663@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:56081 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752298AbZK2TuF (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:50:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <9e4733910911291116r66dda6dap591d1b0f322f9663@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: jonsmirl@gmail.com Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, awalls@radix.net, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, jarod@wilsonet.com, khc@pm.waw.pl, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, maximlevitsky@gmail.com, mchehab@redhat.com, ray-lk@madrabbit.org, stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de, superm1@ubuntu.com Hi, on 29 Nov 09 at 14:16, Jon Smirl wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Alan Cox wrote: >>> Jon is asking for an architecture discussion, y'know, with use cases. [...] > So we're just back to the status quo of last year which is to do > nothing except some minor clean up. > > We'll be back here again next year repeating this until IR gets > redesigned into something fairly invisible like keyboard and mouse > drivers. Last year everyone complained that LIRC does not support evdev - so I added support for evdev. This year everyone complains that LIRC is not plug'n'play - we'll fix that 'til next year. There's progress. ;-) Christoph