From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3695C28CBC for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 12:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F774206D5 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 12:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="kaEO8qV6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727067AbgEFMiA (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2020 08:38:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60798 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727874AbgEFMh7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2020 08:37:59 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x143.google.com (mail-lf1-x143.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::143]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 694BFC061A41 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 05:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x143.google.com with SMTP id t11so1197096lfe.4 for ; Wed, 06 May 2020 05:37:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5vIN5MKPLeNGbWiYHgtJvnfkqaDr6sG1XDxpbHqc8lM=; b=kaEO8qV6PIFjtYwjIDIahnc/RQhVLTmcERmgJGOXglVl98mzoWY2lV+n22uUQ3sTU9 oCcsrORlY/Y6EPw6AOdxdX5hS9ObK6ICW5Zc2X4VzbEsQvt+d3sAd06d4Xt9vP8o7oEg if+HkIsWMBp4gg383s9tXCLbndzR5RzR9/v/XEau0KqBATsQeodpC6OyXd2Fy7ZXdai/ nY7FWkCB9mFTaKZX4MnTXzjyO++yl6X/9Rf4f69mnXz+wf1X5QyL27JvrRjNYJ5ZZVc3 JOS/p3dYNhGBT6XWiogysHwo3eovKnA1xBe9i2RMBn6oMTaCUS3UByCH4WZIkA3jIhyt 8fPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5vIN5MKPLeNGbWiYHgtJvnfkqaDr6sG1XDxpbHqc8lM=; b=qYlaodH4dELk7kIgLRSCpW1KD0/z/PiSHTF9Nl/XoVgaMFbw0Iy1AuwcwBLAIrCCl5 ZYJ0J33DslozEG6f5KAPQCQs4Sw8VIU9/LdqarL+P5BWCUl/NP08iGJETYR0J8oE0PoY I8bJDChbYgaqJGkFPaoHp0/W+YioxL/9TB/kcoH6B29L5LIfoRG8dAtGq21O8K3Qf6E5 eqNwF22xDpDFNprqrzRTBcqRIL/qIMgmUvd5u79fXW5atTFH1MZjBJATI9qprSkEqyA/ 9UN565dkrs7MiBu7OBLNDRgBZQantpjXtRF8LObOuzrLwZ74sW8IeBjmiYwb/8KF1Im6 Kmzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYi/J0mJF9jzdQ+2E04eDLiA/z5OGTo/jj/RCr0RfXQUt31nB+P BKEe7lkiGJWejsTIt1pNaKYk9k7T3/8aFv/qtJQiLA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIscBufxrzX8o55c1IMYLoTuOUYZIw8WZNx/RqZ9X8rS3BVqal75ivPG1WUGd3PnEmeKRrga5Mx5j8aXZYQyZ4= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:414c:: with SMTP id c12mr4967725lfi.47.1588768677564; Wed, 06 May 2020 05:37:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200503172206.13782-1-xc-racer2@live.ca> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 14:37:45 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] iio: accel: bma180: Prepare for different reset values To: Jonathan Bakker Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald , Rob Herring , linux-iio , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Dmitry Torokhov , Kate Stewart , Greg KH , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Input Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:22 PM Jonathan Bakker wrote: > Some variants of the bma180 (eg bma023) have different reset > values. In preparation for adding support for them, factor > out the reset value into the chip specific data. > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Yours, Linus Walleij