From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: Remove DRIVER_LICENSE? Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:12:20 -0800 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-qt0-f176.google.com ([209.85.216.176]:34424 "EHLO mail-qt0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031661AbdADSMX (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:12:23 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-f176.google.com with SMTP id d45so275794896qta.1 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com (mail-qk0-f173.google.com. [209.85.220.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 32sm15857076qtz.26.2017.01.04.10.12.21 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:12:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id n21so408826279qka.3 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:12:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Grant Grundler Cc: linux-input , Dmitry Torokhov On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Grant Grundler wrote: > I'm researching MODULE_LICENSE uses/declarations and AFAICT > DRIVER_LICENSE is only obfuscating the programatically declared > license. e.g.: > > drivers/hid/hid-core.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL" > drivers/hid/hid-core.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE); > drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL" > drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE); > drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL" > drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE); > drivers/hid/wacom.h:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL" > drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE); > > Any objection to removing those uses in drivers/hid? Sounds good to me. Thanks. -- Dmitry